Tests: use a consistent naming convention for allocators

This commit is contained in:
Benoit Blanchon
2023-07-25 14:53:54 +02:00
parent 7a76da3bc7
commit 30ec507989
25 changed files with 698 additions and 698 deletions

View File

@ -91,8 +91,8 @@ TEST_CASE("JsonArray::remove()") {
}
TEST_CASE("Removed elements are recycled") {
SpyingAllocator allocator;
JsonDocument doc(&allocator);
SpyingAllocator spy;
JsonDocument doc(&spy);
JsonArray array = doc.to<JsonArray>();
// fill the pool entirely
@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ TEST_CASE("Removed elements are recycled") {
// add one element; it should use the free slot
array.add(42);
REQUIRE(allocator.log() == AllocatorLog() << AllocatorLog::Allocate(
sizeofPool()) // only one pool
REQUIRE(spy.log() == AllocatorLog() << AllocatorLog::Allocate(
sizeofPool()) // only one pool
);
}