From 747597c7efff4f1b509475bbdd0ff9d6197353f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Aleksey Gurtovoy Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 03:35:12 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] merge RC_1_32_0 fixes [SVN r26328] --- minmax/index.html | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/minmax/index.html b/minmax/index.html index 42bb831..f7364a4 100644 --- a/minmax/index.html +++ b/minmax/index.html @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@

Header <boost/algorithm/minmax.hpp>

+HREF="../../../boost/algorithm/minmax.hpp">boost/algorithm/minmax.hpp> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ but I ruled against that (see rationale).

If you are interested about -performance, +performance, you will see that minmax_element is just slightly less efficient than a single min_element or max_element, and thus twice as efficient as two separate calls to min_element and @@ -301,8 +301,8 @@ the library under

Notes

-[1]We do not support -idioms such as tie(a,b)=minmax(a,b) +[1] We do not support +idioms such as tie(a,b)=minmax(a,b) to order two elements a, b, although this would have the desired effect if we returned a reference instead of a constant reference. The reason is that two unnecessary assignments are