Daniel James ffee60eade Require a compiler which does not need BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS ...

This was defined independent of the compiler version. It is not known
if this is a true limitation of the digital mars compiler in all
versions, or a bug in this header.

(from Stephen Kelly)

Daniel James: I checked the latest version of digital mars. It mostly supports
explicit function template arguments, apart when a function is overloaded for
type and value template arguments, which causes the config test to fail.  So in
most cases the macro isn't needed.

[SVN r85273]

2013-08-10 12:42:22 +00:00

..

config

Require a compiler which does not need BOOST_NO_EXPLICIT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGUMENTS

2013-08-10 12:42:22 +00:00

detail

Remove support for no numeric_limits: the old header was not Boost licence compatible, and is almost certainly no longer used by anyone anyway.

2013-03-12 09:24:08 +00:00

config.hpp

Make Boost.Config C language compatible.

2011-04-03 17:55:30 +00:00

limits.hpp

Remove support for no numeric_limits: the old header was not Boost licence compatible, and is almost certainly no longer used by anyone anyway.

2013-03-12 09:24:08 +00:00

version.hpp

Bump version to 1.55

2013-07-01 17:05:47 +00:00