mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/function.git
synced 2025-07-29 12:27:15 +02:00
function_base.hpp:
- GCC 3.0 and later do support enable_if. Not sure what happened there... - Use BOOST_WORKAROUND in some places (more to come...) [SVN r16612]
This commit is contained in:
@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
|
||||
#include <boost/type_traits/is_stateless.hpp>
|
||||
#include <boost/ref.hpp>
|
||||
#include <boost/pending/ct_if.hpp>
|
||||
#include <boost/detail/workaround.hpp>
|
||||
|
||||
#if defined(BOOST_MSVC) && BOOST_MSVC <= 1300 || defined(__ICL) && __ICL <= 600 || defined(__MWERKS__) && __MWERKS__ < 0x2406 && !defined(BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG)
|
||||
# define BOOST_FUNCTION_TARGET_FIX(x) x
|
||||
@ -42,9 +43,8 @@ namespace boost { namespace python { namespace objects {
|
||||
}}}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
// GCC 3.2 doesn't seem to support enable_if, so we assume that
|
||||
// earlier versions have the same limitation
|
||||
#if defined(__GNUC__) && __GNUC__ < 3 || ( __GNUC__ == 3 && __GNUC_MINOR__ <= 2 ) && !(BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG)
|
||||
// GCC 2.95.3 (or earlier) doesn't support enable_if
|
||||
#if BOOST_WORKAROUND(__GNUC__, < 3)
|
||||
# define BOOST_FUNCTION_NO_ENABLE_IF
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
@ -284,6 +284,12 @@ namespace boost {
|
||||
}
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
|
||||
template<bool, typename> struct enable_if;
|
||||
|
||||
template<typename T> struct enable_if<true, T> { typedef T type; };
|
||||
template<typename T> struct enable_if<false, T> {};
|
||||
#else
|
||||
# if defined(BOOST_STRICT_CONFIG) || !defined(__HP_aCC) || __HP_aCC > 33900
|
||||
template<bool>
|
||||
# else
|
||||
@ -311,6 +317,8 @@ namespace boost {
|
||||
struct enable_if : public enabled<Enabled>::template base<T>
|
||||
{
|
||||
};
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
} // end namespace function
|
||||
} // end namespace detail
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user