boostorg/function
1
0
Fork 1
mirror of https://github.com/boostorg/function.git synced 2025-07-18 15:12:09 +02:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Removed question about member function pointers since they are now supported

Browse Source 
[SVN r11628]
This commit is contained in:
Douglas Gregor
2001-11-07 20:16:09 +00:00
parent e5ff80fb52
commit dd76ed757b
1 changed files with 1 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
doc/faq.html
View File

@ -34,14 +34,11 @@ void g() { return f(); }
<h2>Q: Why (function) cloning? </h2>
<p> In November and December of 2000, the issue of cloning vs. reference counting was debated at length and it was decided that cloning gave more predictable semantics. I won't rehash the discussion here, but if it cloning is incorrect for a particular application a reference-counting allocator could be used.
<h2>Q: How do I assign from a member function?</h2>
<p> Member function assignments are not included directly in <code>boost::function</code> because they do not conform to the syntax of function objects. Several libraries exist to wrap member functions in a function object and/or bind the first argument to the member function (the <code>this</code> pointer). A few libraries are <a href="tutorial.html#member_func">described</a> in the <a href="../index.html">Boost.Function</a> documentation.
<hr>
<address><a href="mailto:gregod@cs.rpi.edu">Doug Gregor</a></address>
<!-- Created: Fri Feb 16 09:30:41 EST 2001 -->
<!-- hhmts start -->
Last modified: Sat Jul 14 16:00:11 EDT 2001
Last modified: Wed Nov 7 15:11:52 EST 2001
<!-- hhmts end -->
</body>
</html>