From 9065912ab312dfae3fa01b6ba6505489a5e0cfe2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel James <daniel@calamity.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 22:44:27 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Use an array instead of std::set in hash_no_ext_fail_test, as
 that seems like a better test for older compilers.

[SVN r33194]
---
 hash/test/hash_no_ext_fail_test.cpp | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hash/test/hash_no_ext_fail_test.cpp b/hash/test/hash_no_ext_fail_test.cpp
index 403dfd9..61495b0 100644
--- a/hash/test/hash_no_ext_fail_test.cpp
+++ b/hash/test/hash_no_ext_fail_test.cpp
@@ -12,10 +12,9 @@
 
 #include <boost/functional/hash.hpp>
 #include <boost/functional/hash.hpp>
-#include <set>
 
 int main()
 {
-    HASH_NAMESPACE::hash< std::set<int> > hasher;
+    HASH_NAMESPACE::hash< int[10] > hasher;
     return 0;
 }