From bcc83a662af738abff7c6062072a5cf092379729 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2022 21:46:25 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] spelling: compiling Signed-off-by: Josh Soref <2119212+jsoref@users.noreply.github.com> --- doc/17_gotchas.qbk | 2 +- .../gotchas/false_positive_with__wmaybe_uninitialized.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/17_gotchas.qbk b/doc/17_gotchas.qbk index 018ab6a..8e894e9 100644 --- a/doc/17_gotchas.qbk +++ b/doc/17_gotchas.qbk @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ you can sometimes get an unexpected runtime result where you would rather expect [section False positive with -Wmaybe-uninitialized] -Sometimes on GCC compilers below version 5.1 you may get an -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning when copiling with option -02 on a perfectly valid `boost::optional` usage. For instance in this program: +Sometimes on GCC compilers below version 5.1 you may get an -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning when compiling with option -02 on a perfectly valid `boost::optional` usage. For instance in this program: #include diff --git a/doc/html/boost_optional/tutorial/gotchas/false_positive_with__wmaybe_uninitialized.html b/doc/html/boost_optional/tutorial/gotchas/false_positive_with__wmaybe_uninitialized.html index 0a71929..0228f2e 100644 --- a/doc/html/boost_optional/tutorial/gotchas/false_positive_with__wmaybe_uninitialized.html +++ b/doc/html/boost_optional/tutorial/gotchas/false_positive_with__wmaybe_uninitialized.html @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@

Sometimes on GCC compilers below version 5.1 you may get an -Wmaybe-uninitialized - warning when copiling with option -02 on a perfectly valid boost::optional usage. For instance in this + warning when compiling with option -02 on a perfectly valid boost::optional usage. For instance in this program: 

#include <boost/optional.hpp>