mirror of
https://github.com/boostorg/optional.git
synced 2025-07-30 04:27:19 +02:00
Improved documentation. Added some noexcept.
This commit is contained in:
@ -45,82 +45,23 @@ Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0.
|
||||
[def __GO_TO__ [$images/callouts/R.png]]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[section Motivation]
|
||||
[section Introduction]
|
||||
This library can be used to represent 'optional' (or 'nullable') objects and safely pass them by value:
|
||||
|
||||
Consider these functions which should return a value but which might not have
|
||||
a value to return:
|
||||
|
||||
* (A) `double sqrt(double n );`
|
||||
* (B) `char get_async_input();`
|
||||
* (C) `point polygon::get_any_point_effectively_inside();`
|
||||
|
||||
There are different approaches to the issue of not having a value to return.
|
||||
|
||||
A typical approach is to consider the existence of a valid return value as a
|
||||
postcondition, so that if the function cannot compute the value to return, it
|
||||
has either undefined behavior (and can use assert in a debug build) or uses a
|
||||
runtime check and throws an exception if the postcondition is violated. This
|
||||
is a reasonable choice for example, for function (A), because the lack of a
|
||||
proper return value is directly related to an invalid parameter (out of domain
|
||||
argument), so it is appropriate to require the callee to supply only parameters
|
||||
in a valid domain for execution to continue normally.
|
||||
|
||||
However, function (B), because of its asynchronous nature, does not fail just
|
||||
because it can't find a value to return; so it is incorrect to consider such
|
||||
a situation an error and assert or throw an exception. This function must
|
||||
return, and somehow, must tell the callee that it is not returning a meaningful
|
||||
value.
|
||||
|
||||
A similar situation occurs with function (C): it is conceptually an error to
|
||||
ask a ['null-area] polygon to return a point inside itself, but in many
|
||||
applications, it is just impractical for performance reasons to treat this as
|
||||
an error (because detecting that the polygon has no area might be too expensive
|
||||
to be required to be tested previously), and either an arbitrary point
|
||||
(typically at infinity) is returned, or some efficient way to tell the callee
|
||||
that there is no such point is used.
|
||||
|
||||
There are various mechanisms to let functions communicate that the returned
|
||||
value is not valid. One such mechanism, which is quite common since it has
|
||||
zero or negligible overhead, is to use a special value which is reserved to
|
||||
communicate this. Classical examples of such special values are `EOF`,
|
||||
`string::npos`, points at infinity, etc...
|
||||
|
||||
When those values exist, i.e. the return type can hold all meaningful values
|
||||
['plus] the ['signal] value, this mechanism is quite appropriate and well known.
|
||||
Unfortunately, there are cases when such values do not exist. In these cases,
|
||||
the usual alternative is either to use a wider type, such as `int` in place of
|
||||
`char`; or a compound type, such as `std::pair<point,bool>`.
|
||||
|
||||
Returning a `std::pair<T,bool>`, thus attaching a boolean flag to the result
|
||||
which indicates if the result is meaningful, has the advantage that can be
|
||||
turned into a consistent idiom since the first element of the pair can be
|
||||
whatever the function would conceptually return. For example, the last two
|
||||
functions could have the following interface:
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<char,bool> get_async_input();
|
||||
std::pair<point,bool> polygon::get_any_point_effectively_inside();
|
||||
|
||||
These functions use a consistent interface for dealing with possibly nonexistent
|
||||
results:
|
||||
|
||||
std::pair<point,bool> p = poly.get_any_point_effectively_inside();
|
||||
if ( p.second )
|
||||
flood_fill(p.first);
|
||||
|
||||
However, not only is this quite a burden syntactically, it is also error prone
|
||||
since the user can easily use the function result (first element of the pair)
|
||||
without ever checking if it has a valid value.
|
||||
|
||||
Clearly, we need a better idiom.
|
||||
optional<int> readInt(); // this function may return either an int or a not-an-int
|
||||
|
||||
if (optional<int> oi = readInt()) // did I get a real int
|
||||
cout << "my int is: " << *oi; // use my int
|
||||
else
|
||||
cout << "I have no int";
|
||||
|
||||
[endsect]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
[include motivation.qbk]
|
||||
[include development.qbk]
|
||||
[include reference.qbk]
|
||||
[include examples.qbk]
|
||||
[include special_cases.qbk]
|
||||
[include implementation_notes.qbk]
|
||||
[include dependencies.qbk]
|
||||
[include acknowledgments.qbk]
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user