Assume variadic macro support.

doc/data/arrays.html

@@ -24,11 +24,9 @@
       0 size. The notation for an empty array is '(0,())'.<br>
       <br>
       <span style="font-style: italic;"> </span></div>
-    <div>With variadic macro support a <i>tuple </i>has all of the
+    <div>A <i>tuple </i>has all of the
       functionality as an <i>array</i>, knows its own size, and is easier
-      syntactically to use. Because of that an <i>array</i> should be used, as
-      opposed to a <i>tuple</i>, only if your compiler does not support
-      variadic macros. The only advantage an <i>array </i>has over a <i>tuple
+      syntactically to use. The only advantage an <i>array </i>has over a <i>tuple
       </i>is that an <i>array </i>can be empty while a <i>tuple </i>always
       has at least one element and therefore can never have a size of 0.<br>
       <br>

doc/data/tuples.html

@@ -15,10 +15,8 @@
       A <i>tuple </i>cannot be empty. The notation '()' as a <i>tuple </i>is
       a single element <i>tuple </i>of size 1, where the element is empty. </div>
     <div> <i>Tuples</i> are fast and easy to use.&nbsp; With variadic macro
-      support it is not necessary to know the size of a <i>tuple; </i>without
-      variadic macro support&nbsp;all access to <i>tuples</i> requires
-      knowledge of its size. Use a <i>tuple </i>instead of an <i>array</i> if
-      your compiler supports variadic macros, since a <i>tuple </i>has all of
+      support it is not necessary to know the size of a <i>tuple</i>.
+      Use a <i>tuple </i>instead of an <i>array</i>, since a <i>tuple </i>has all of
       the functionality as an <i>array </i>and is easier syntactically to use.
       The only functionality an <i>array </i>has which a <i>tuple </i>does
       not have is that an <i>array </i>can be empty whereas a <i>tuple </i>cannot