Added missing preconditions, and fixed minor typos.

[SVN r22529]
This commit is contained in:
John Maddock
2004-03-20 11:53:56 +00:00
parent cdd130ae2d
commit 5a29047906
4 changed files with 210 additions and 210 deletions

View File

@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<const char*> cregex_token_i
typedef regex_token_iterator<std::string::const_iterator> sregex_token_iterator;
#ifndef BOOST_NO_WREGEX
typedef regex_token_iterator<const wchar_t*> wcregex_token_iterator;
typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_iterator;
typedef regex_token_iterator&lt;&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_iterator;
#endif
</PRE>
<H3><A name="description"></A>Description</H3>
@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_
<P><B> Effects:</B> constructs an end of sequence iterator.</P>
<PRE><A name=c2></A>regex_token_iterator(BidirectionalIterator a, BidirectionalIterator b, const regex_type&amp; re,
int submatch = 0, match_flag_type m = match_default);</PRE>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.</P>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.&nbsp; Object re shall exist
for the lifetime of the iterator constructed from it.</P>
<P><B> Effects:</B> constructs a regex_token_iterator that will enumerate one
string for each regular expression match of the expression <EM>re</EM> found
within the sequence <EM>[a,b)</EM>, using match flags <EM>m</EM>.&nbsp; The
@ -99,7 +100,8 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_
configured</A> in non-recursive mode).</P>
<PRE><A name=c3></A>regex_token_iterator(BidirectionalIterator a, BidirectionalIterator b, const regex_type&amp; re,
const std::vector&lt;int&gt;&amp; submatches, match_flag_type m = match_default);</PRE>
<P><B> Preconditions:</B> <CODE>submatches.size() &amp;&amp; !re.empty()</CODE>.</P>
<P><B> Preconditions:</B> <CODE>submatches.size() &amp;&amp; !re.empty()</CODE>.&nbsp;
Object re shall exist for the lifetime of the iterator constructed from it.</P>
<P><B> Effects:</B> constructs a regex_token_iterator that will enumerate <EM>submatches.size()</EM>
strings for each regular expression match of the expression <EM>re</EM> found
within the sequence <EM>[a,b)</EM>, using match flags <EM>m</EM>.&nbsp; For
@ -118,7 +120,8 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_
<PRE><A name=c4></A>template &lt;std::size_t N&gt;
regex_token_iterator(BidirectionalIterator a, BidirectionalIterator b, const regex_type&amp; re,
const int (&amp;submatches)[R], match_flag_type m = match_default);</PRE>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.</P>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.&nbsp; Object re shall exist
for the lifetime of the iterator constructed from it.</P>
<P><STRONG>Effects:</STRONG></B> constructs a regex_token_iterator that will
enumerate&nbsp;<EM>R</EM> strings for each regular expression match of the
expression <EM>re</EM> found within the sequence <EM>[a,b)</EM>, using match

View File

@ -91,18 +91,18 @@
<P>Parentheses serve two purposes, to group items together into a sub-expression,
and to mark what generated the match. For example the expression "(ab)*" would
match all of the string "ababab". The matching algorithms <A href="regex_match.html">
regex_match</A> and <A href="regex_search.html">regex_search</A>
each take an instance of <A href="match_results.html">match_results</A>
that reports what caused the match, on exit from these functions the <A href="match_results.html">
match_results</A> contains information both on what the whole expression
matched and on what each sub-expression matched. In the example above
match_results[1] would contain a pair of iterators denoting the final "ab" of
the matching string. It is permissible for sub-expressions to match null
strings. If a sub-expression takes no part in a match - for example if it is
part of an alternative that is not taken - then both of the iterators that are
returned for that sub-expression point to the end of the input string, and the <I>matched</I>
parameter for that sub-expression is <I>false</I>. Sub-expressions are indexed
from left to right starting from 1, sub-expression 0 is the whole expression.
regex_match</A> and <A href="regex_search.html">regex_search</A> each take
an instance of <A href="match_results.html">match_results</A> that reports what
caused the match, on exit from these functions the <A href="match_results.html">match_results</A>
contains information both on what the whole expression matched and on what each
sub-expression matched. In the example above match_results[1] would contain a
pair of iterators denoting the final "ab" of the matching string. It is
permissible for sub-expressions to match null strings. If a sub-expression
takes no part in a match - for example if it is part of an alternative that is
not taken - then both of the iterators that are returned for that
sub-expression point to the end of the input string, and the <I>matched</I> parameter
for that sub-expression is <I>false</I>. Sub-expressions are indexed from left
to right starting from 1, sub-expression 0 is the whole expression.
</P>
<H3>Non-Marking Parenthesis
</H3>
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
<P>A set is a set of characters that can match any single character that is a
member of the set. Sets are delimited by "[" and "]" and can contain literals,
character ranges, character classes, collating elements and equivalence
classes. Set declarations that start with "^" contain the compliment of the
classes. Set declarations that start with "^" contain the complement of the
elements that follow.
</P>
<P>Examples:
@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
[^[.ae.]] would only match one character.&nbsp;
</P>
<P>
Equivalence classes take the general form[=tagname=] inside a set declaration,
Equivalence classes take the generalform[=tagname=] inside a set declaration,
where <I>tagname</I> is either a single character, or a name of a collating
element, and matches any character that is a member of the same primary
equivalence class as the collating element [.tagname.]. An equivalence class is
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
typically collated by character, then by accent, and then by case; the primary
sort key then relates to the character, the secondary to the accentation, and
the tertiary to the case). If there is no equivalence class corresponding to <I>tagname</I>
, then[=tagname=] is exactly the same as [.tagname.]. Unfortunately there is no
,then[=tagname=] is exactly the same as [.tagname.]. Unfortunately there is no
locale independent method of obtaining the primary sort key for a character,
except under Win32. For other operating systems the library will "guess" the
primary sort key from the full sort key (obtained from <I>strxfrm</I>), so
@ -666,106 +666,103 @@
<H3>What gets matched?
</H3>
<P>
When the expression is compiled as a Perl-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will perform a depth first search on the state machine and report
the first match found.</P>
When the expression is compiled as a Perl-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will perform a depth first search on the state machine and report
the first match found.</P>
<P>
When the expression is compiled as a POSIX-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will match the first possible matching string, if more than one
string starting at a given location can match then it matches the longest
possible string, unless the flag match_any is set, in which case the first
match encountered is returned. Use of the match_any option can reduce the time
taken to find the match - but is only useful if the user is less concerned
about what matched - for example it would not be suitable for search and
replace operations. In cases where their are multiple possible matches all
starting at the same location, and all of the same length, then the match
chosen is the one with the longest first sub-expression, if that is the same
for two or more matches, then the second sub-expression will be examined and so
on.
</P><P>
The following table examples illustrate the main differences between Perl and
POSIX regular expression matching rules:
When the expression is compiled as a POSIX-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will match the first possible matching string, if more than one
string starting at a given location can match then it matches the longest
possible string, unless the flag match_any is set, in which case the first
match encountered is returned. Use of the match_any option can reduce the time
taken to find the match - but is only useful if the user is less concerned
about what matched - for example it would not be suitable for search and
replace operations. In cases where their are multiple possible matches all
starting at the same location, and all of the same length, then the match
chosen is the one with the longest first sub-expression, if that is the same
for two or more matches, then the second sub-expression will be examined and so
on.
</P>
<P>
<TABLE id="Table5" cellSpacing="1" cellPadding="7" width="624" border="1">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Expression</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Text</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>POSIX leftmost longest match</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>ECMAScript depth first search match</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>a|ab</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
xaby</CODE>
The following table examples illustrate the main differences between Perl and
POSIX regular expression matching rules:
</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
"ab"</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
"a"</CODE></P></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
.*([[:alnum:]]+).*</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
" abc def xyz "</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "abc"</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "z"</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
.*(a|xayy)</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
zzxayyzz</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
"zzxayy"</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>"zzxa"</CODE></P>
</TD>
</TR>
</TBODY></CODE></TD></TR></TABLE>
<P>
<TABLE id="Table5" cellSpacing="1" cellPadding="7" width="624" border="1">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Expression</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Text</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>POSIX leftmost longest match</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>ECMAScript depth first search match</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>a|ab</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> xaby</CODE>
</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> "ab"</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> "a"</CODE></P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> .*([[:alnum:]]+).*</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> " abc def xyz "</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "abc"</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "z"</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> .*(a|xayy)</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> zzxayyzz</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> "zzxayy"</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>"zzxa"</CODE></P>
</TD>
</TR>
</TBODY></CODE></TD></TR></TABLE>
<P>These differences between Perl matching rules, and POSIX matching rules, mean
that these two regular expression syntaxes differ not only in the features
offered, but also in the form that the state machine takes and/or the
algorithms used to traverse the state machine.</p>
<HR>
algorithms used to traverse the state machine.</P>
<HR>
<p>Revised
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%d %B, %Y" startspan -->
24 Oct 2003
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="39359" --></p>
<p><i><EFBFBD> Copyright John Maddock&nbsp;1998-
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%Y" startspan -->
2003<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="39359" --></i></p>
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%Y" startspan --> 2003<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="39359" --></i></p>
<P><I>Use, modification and distribution are subject to the Boost Software License,
Version 1.0. (See accompanying file <A href="../../../LICENSE_1_0.txt">LICENSE_1_0.txt</A>
or copy at <A href="http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt">http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt</A>)</I></P>
</body>
</html>

View File

@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator&lt;const char*&gt; cregex_token_i
typedef regex_token_iterator&lt;std::string::const_iterator&gt; sregex_token_iterator;
#ifndef BOOST_NO_WREGEX
typedef regex_token_iterator&lt;const wchar_t*&gt; wcregex_token_iterator;
typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_iterator;
typedef regex_token_iterator&lt;&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_iterator;
#endif
</PRE>
<H3><A name="description"></A>Description</H3>
@ -84,7 +84,8 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_
<P><B> Effects:</B> constructs an end of sequence iterator.</P>
<PRE><A name=c2></A>regex_token_iterator(BidirectionalIterator a, BidirectionalIterator b, const regex_type&amp; re,
int submatch = 0, match_flag_type m = match_default);</PRE>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.</P>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.&nbsp; Object re shall exist
for the lifetime of the iterator constructed from it.</P>
<P><B> Effects:</B> constructs a regex_token_iterator that will enumerate one
string for each regular expression match of the expression <EM>re</EM> found
within the sequence <EM>[a,b)</EM>, using match flags <EM>m</EM>.&nbsp; The
@ -99,7 +100,8 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_
configured</A> in non-recursive mode).</P>
<PRE><A name=c3></A>regex_token_iterator(BidirectionalIterator a, BidirectionalIterator b, const regex_type&amp; re,
const std::vector&lt;int&gt;&amp; submatches, match_flag_type m = match_default);</PRE>
<P><B> Preconditions:</B> <CODE>submatches.size() &amp;&amp; !re.empty()</CODE>.</P>
<P><B> Preconditions:</B> <CODE>submatches.size() &amp;&amp; !re.empty()</CODE>.&nbsp;
Object re shall exist for the lifetime of the iterator constructed from it.</P>
<P><B> Effects:</B> constructs a regex_token_iterator that will enumerate <EM>submatches.size()</EM>
strings for each regular expression match of the expression <EM>re</EM> found
within the sequence <EM>[a,b)</EM>, using match flags <EM>m</EM>.&nbsp; For
@ -118,7 +120,8 @@ typedef regex_token_iterator<&lt;std::wstring::const_iterator&gt; wsregex_token_
<PRE><A name=c4></A>template &lt;std::size_t N&gt;
regex_token_iterator(BidirectionalIterator a, BidirectionalIterator b, const regex_type&amp; re,
const int (&amp;submatches)[R], match_flag_type m = match_default);</PRE>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.</P>
<P><B> Preconditions: </B><CODE>!re.empty()</CODE>.&nbsp; Object re shall exist
for the lifetime of the iterator constructed from it.</P>
<P><STRONG>Effects:</STRONG></B> constructs a regex_token_iterator that will
enumerate&nbsp;<EM>R</EM> strings for each regular expression match of the
expression <EM>re</EM> found within the sequence <EM>[a,b)</EM>, using match

View File

@ -91,18 +91,18 @@
<P>Parentheses serve two purposes, to group items together into a sub-expression,
and to mark what generated the match. For example the expression "(ab)*" would
match all of the string "ababab". The matching algorithms <A href="regex_match.html">
regex_match</A> and <A href="regex_search.html">regex_search</A>
each take an instance of <A href="match_results.html">match_results</A>
that reports what caused the match, on exit from these functions the <A href="match_results.html">
match_results</A> contains information both on what the whole expression
matched and on what each sub-expression matched. In the example above
match_results[1] would contain a pair of iterators denoting the final "ab" of
the matching string. It is permissible for sub-expressions to match null
strings. If a sub-expression takes no part in a match - for example if it is
part of an alternative that is not taken - then both of the iterators that are
returned for that sub-expression point to the end of the input string, and the <I>matched</I>
parameter for that sub-expression is <I>false</I>. Sub-expressions are indexed
from left to right starting from 1, sub-expression 0 is the whole expression.
regex_match</A> and <A href="regex_search.html">regex_search</A> each take
an instance of <A href="match_results.html">match_results</A> that reports what
caused the match, on exit from these functions the <A href="match_results.html">match_results</A>
contains information both on what the whole expression matched and on what each
sub-expression matched. In the example above match_results[1] would contain a
pair of iterators denoting the final "ab" of the matching string. It is
permissible for sub-expressions to match null strings. If a sub-expression
takes no part in a match - for example if it is part of an alternative that is
not taken - then both of the iterators that are returned for that
sub-expression point to the end of the input string, and the <I>matched</I> parameter
for that sub-expression is <I>false</I>. Sub-expressions are indexed from left
to right starting from 1, sub-expression 0 is the whole expression.
</P>
<H3>Non-Marking Parenthesis
</H3>
@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
<P>A set is a set of characters that can match any single character that is a
member of the set. Sets are delimited by "[" and "]" and can contain literals,
character ranges, character classes, collating elements and equivalence
classes. Set declarations that start with "^" contain the compliment of the
classes. Set declarations that start with "^" contain the complement of the
elements that follow.
</P>
<P>Examples:
@ -293,7 +293,7 @@
[^[.ae.]] would only match one character.&nbsp;
</P>
<P>
Equivalence classes take the general form[=tagname=] inside a set declaration,
Equivalence classes take the generalform[=tagname=] inside a set declaration,
where <I>tagname</I> is either a single character, or a name of a collating
element, and matches any character that is a member of the same primary
equivalence class as the collating element [.tagname.]. An equivalence class is
@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
typically collated by character, then by accent, and then by case; the primary
sort key then relates to the character, the secondary to the accentation, and
the tertiary to the case). If there is no equivalence class corresponding to <I>tagname</I>
, then[=tagname=] is exactly the same as [.tagname.]. Unfortunately there is no
,then[=tagname=] is exactly the same as [.tagname.]. Unfortunately there is no
locale independent method of obtaining the primary sort key for a character,
except under Win32. For other operating systems the library will "guess" the
primary sort key from the full sort key (obtained from <I>strxfrm</I>), so
@ -666,106 +666,103 @@
<H3>What gets matched?
</H3>
<P>
When the expression is compiled as a Perl-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will perform a depth first search on the state machine and report
the first match found.</P>
When the expression is compiled as a Perl-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will perform a depth first search on the state machine and report
the first match found.</P>
<P>
When the expression is compiled as a POSIX-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will match the first possible matching string, if more than one
string starting at a given location can match then it matches the longest
possible string, unless the flag match_any is set, in which case the first
match encountered is returned. Use of the match_any option can reduce the time
taken to find the match - but is only useful if the user is less concerned
about what matched - for example it would not be suitable for search and
replace operations. In cases where their are multiple possible matches all
starting at the same location, and all of the same length, then the match
chosen is the one with the longest first sub-expression, if that is the same
for two or more matches, then the second sub-expression will be examined and so
on.
</P><P>
The following table examples illustrate the main differences between Perl and
POSIX regular expression matching rules:
When the expression is compiled as a POSIX-compatible regex then the matching
algorithms will match the first possible matching string, if more than one
string starting at a given location can match then it matches the longest
possible string, unless the flag match_any is set, in which case the first
match encountered is returned. Use of the match_any option can reduce the time
taken to find the match - but is only useful if the user is less concerned
about what matched - for example it would not be suitable for search and
replace operations. In cases where their are multiple possible matches all
starting at the same location, and all of the same length, then the match
chosen is the one with the longest first sub-expression, if that is the same
for two or more matches, then the second sub-expression will be examined and so
on.
</P>
<P>
<TABLE id="Table5" cellSpacing="1" cellPadding="7" width="624" border="1">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Expression</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Text</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>POSIX leftmost longest match</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>ECMAScript depth first search match</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>a|ab</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
xaby</CODE>
The following table examples illustrate the main differences between Perl and
POSIX regular expression matching rules:
</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
"ab"</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
"a"</CODE></P></TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
.*([[:alnum:]]+).*</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
" abc def xyz "</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "abc"</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "z"</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
.*(a|xayy)</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
zzxayyzz</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>
"zzxayy"</CODE></P></TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>"zzxa"</CODE></P>
</TD>
</TR>
</TBODY></CODE></TD></TR></TABLE>
<P>
<TABLE id="Table5" cellSpacing="1" cellPadding="7" width="624" border="1">
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Expression</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>Text</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>POSIX leftmost longest match</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>ECMAScript depth first search match</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>a|ab</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> xaby</CODE>
</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> "ab"</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> "a"</CODE></P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> .*([[:alnum:]]+).*</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> " abc def xyz "</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "abc"</P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P>$0 = " abc def xyz "<BR>
$1 = "z"</P>
</TD>
</TR>
<TR>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> .*(a|xayy)</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> zzxayyzz</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE> "zzxayy"</CODE></P>
</TD>
<TD vAlign="top" width="25%">
<P><CODE>"zzxa"</CODE></P>
</TD>
</TR>
</TBODY></CODE></TD></TR></TABLE>
<P>These differences between Perl matching rules, and POSIX matching rules, mean
that these two regular expression syntaxes differ not only in the features
offered, but also in the form that the state machine takes and/or the
algorithms used to traverse the state machine.</p>
<HR>
algorithms used to traverse the state machine.</P>
<HR>
<p>Revised
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%d %B, %Y" startspan -->
24 Oct 2003
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="39359" --></p>
<p><i><EFBFBD> Copyright John Maddock&nbsp;1998-
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%Y" startspan -->
2003<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="39359" --></i></p>
<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" S-Type="EDITED" S-Format="%Y" startspan --> 2003<!--webbot bot="Timestamp" endspan i-checksum="39359" --></i></p>
<P><I>Use, modification and distribution are subject to the Boost Software License,
Version 1.0. (See accompanying file <A href="../../../LICENSE_1_0.txt">LICENSE_1_0.txt</A>
or copy at <A href="http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt">http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt</A>)</I></P>
</body>
</html>