This commit was manufactured by cvs2svn to create tag

'Version_1_33_1'.

[SVN r31916]

include/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_cw_ppc.hpp

@@ -34,55 +34,61 @@ namespace detail
 
 inline void atomic_increment( register long * pw )
 {
+    register int a;
+
     asm
     {
 loop:
 
-    lwarx   r4, 0, r3
+    lwarx   a, 0, pw
-    addi    r4, r4, 1
+    addi    a, a, 1
-    stwcx.  r4, 0, r3
+    stwcx.  a, 0, pw
     bne-    loop
     }
 }
 
 inline long atomic_decrement( register long * pw )
 {
+    register int a;
+
     asm
     {
     sync
 
 loop:
 
-    lwarx   r4, 0, r3
+    lwarx   a, 0, pw
-    addi    r4, r4, -1
+    addi    a, a, -1
-    stwcx.  r4, 0, r3
+    stwcx.  a, 0, pw
     bne-    loop
 
-    mr      r3, r4
-
     isync
     }
+
+    return a;
 }
 
 inline long atomic_conditional_increment( register long * pw )
 {
+    register int a;
+
     asm
     {
 loop:
 
-    lwarx   r4, 0, r3
+    lwarx   a, 0, pw
-    cmpwi   r4, 0
+    cmpwi   a, 0
     beq     store
 
-    addi    r4, r4, 1
+    addi    a, a, 1
 
 store:
 
-    stwcx.  r4, 0, r3
+    stwcx.  a, 0, pw
     bne-    loop
-
-    mr      r3, r4
     }
+
+    return a;
 }
 
 class sp_counted_base

include/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_ppc.hpp

@@ -32,11 +32,11 @@ namespace boost
 namespace detail
 {
 
-inline void atomic_increment( long * pw )
+inline void atomic_increment( int * pw )
 {
     // ++*pw;
 
-    long tmp;
+    int tmp;
 
     __asm__
     (
@@ -52,11 +52,11 @@ inline void atomic_increment( long * pw )
     );
 }
 
-inline long atomic_decrement( long * pw )
+inline int atomic_decrement( int * pw )
 {
     // return --*pw;
 
-    long rv;
+    int rv;
 
     __asm__ __volatile__
     (
@@ -76,12 +76,12 @@ inline long atomic_decrement( long * pw )
     return rv;
 }
 
-inline long atomic_conditional_increment( long * pw )
+inline int atomic_conditional_increment( int * pw )
 {
     // if( *pw != 0 ) ++*pw;
     // return *pw;
 
-    long rv;
+    int rv;
 
     __asm__
     (
@@ -109,8 +109,8 @@ private:
     sp_counted_base( sp_counted_base const & );
     sp_counted_base & operator= ( sp_counted_base const & );
 
-    long use_count_;        // #shared
+    int use_count_;        // #shared
-    long weak_count_;       // #weak + (#shared != 0)
+    int weak_count_;       // #weak + (#shared != 0)
 
 public:
 
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ public:
 
     long use_count() const // nothrow
     {
-        return static_cast<long const volatile &>( use_count_ );
+        return static_cast<int const volatile &>( use_count_ );
     }
 };
 

shared_ptr.htm

@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@ p3.reset(new int(2)); // undefined, multiple writes
 			day a highly configurable smart pointer may be invented that is also very easy 
 			to use and very hard to misuse. Until then, <B>shared_ptr</B> is the smart 
 			pointer of choice for a wide range of applications. (Those interested in policy 
-			based smart pointers should read <A href="http://cseng.aw.com/book/0,,0201704315,00.html">
+			based smart pointers should read <A href="http://www.awprofessional.com/bookstore/product.asp?isbn=0201704315&rl=1">
 				Modern C++ Design</A> by Andrei Alexandrescu.)<BR>
 		</P>
 		<P><B>Q.</B> I am not convinced. Default parameters can be used where appropriate