From 1301d774e019c47ac9d0df19b5237266d22732a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel James <daniel@calamity.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 17:15:26 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Add a small note about testing allocators.

[SVN r2953]
---
 test/objects/minimal.hpp | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/objects/minimal.hpp b/test/objects/minimal.hpp
index d63e85e9..81648e0c 100644
--- a/test/objects/minimal.hpp
+++ b/test/objects/minimal.hpp
@@ -173,6 +173,9 @@ namespace minimal
         bool operator>=(const_pointer const& x) const { return ptr_ >= x.ptr_; }
     };
 
+    // TODO: Issue 560 suggests that an allocator doesn't have to have
+    // a default constructor.
+    // http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#560
     template <class T>
     class allocator
     {