From 29d63e378b4f20a00b0e9cea01f282ad71586bf7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel James <daniel@calamity.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 20:53:45 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Unordered: Remove unnecessary `typename`.

Oddly, newer versions of gcc don't complain about it.

[SVN r77043]
---
 test/unordered/allocator_traits.cpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/unordered/allocator_traits.cpp b/test/unordered/allocator_traits.cpp
index 1237426a..1921f61f 100644
--- a/test/unordered/allocator_traits.cpp
+++ b/test/unordered/allocator_traits.cpp
@@ -129,10 +129,10 @@ void test_allocator1()
     typedef allocator1<int> allocator;
     typedef boost::unordered::detail::allocator_traits<allocator> traits;
 #if BOOST_UNORDERED_USE_ALLOCATOR_TRAITS == 1
-    BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((boost::is_same<typename traits::size_type,
+    BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((boost::is_same<traits::size_type,
         std::make_unsigned<std::ptrdiff_t>::type>));
 #else
-    BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((boost::is_same<typename traits::size_type, std::size_t>));
+    BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((boost::is_same<traits::size_type, std::size_t>));
 #endif
     BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((boost::is_same<traits::difference_type, std::ptrdiff_t>));
     BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((boost::is_same<traits::pointer, int*>));