From 51cd1cd2af0442dc89a977f502a237fe02c94bf1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel James Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 08:25:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Some more typos --- doc/rationale.qbk | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/rationale.qbk b/doc/rationale.qbk index 788cabc8..60f0849b 100644 --- a/doc/rationale.qbk +++ b/doc/rationale.qbk @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ containers in the draft standard, so the interface was fixed. But there are still some implementation decisions to make. The priorities are conformance to the standard and portability. -The [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table wikipedia article on hash tables] +The [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table Wikipedia article on hash tables] has a good summary of the implementation issues for hash tables in general. [h2 Data Structure] @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ knowledge of the number of bits in the hash value, so it isn't portable enough to use as a default. It can applicable in certain cases so the containers have a policy based implementation that can use this alternative technique. -Currently this is only done on 64 bit architecures, where prime number +Currently this is only done on 64 bit architectures, where prime number modulus can be expensive. Although this varies depending on the architecture, so I probably should revisit it.