From b3df9afd7a1d47fd520d5cebd4b26f060dbe8274 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel James Date: Sun, 20 May 2007 17:40:15 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Remove the note about issue 560, as it has been marked NAD (not a defect). [SVN r4147] --- doc/rationale.qbk | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/rationale.qbk b/doc/rationale.qbk index a688c18c..bf4ead1f 100644 --- a/doc/rationale.qbk +++ b/doc/rationale.qbk @@ -133,10 +133,4 @@ The proposed resolution is to add a new subsection to 17.4.4: [:An implementation shall not supply an overloaded function signature specified in any library clause if such a signature would be inherently ambiguous during overload resolution due to two library types referring to the same type.] So I don't supply the `iterator` overloads. -[h3 [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-active.html#560 - 560. User-defined allocators without default constructor]] - -This implementation should work okay for an allocator without a default -constructor, although I don't currently test for this. - [endsect]