From 44a98b121b052f722b971a1d19531d1be7e83bff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michel Morin
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:22:55 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Merge r86524 (Correct broken links to C++ standard papers);
fixes #9212
[SVN r86673]
---
utility.htm | 2 +-
value_init.htm | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/utility.htm b/utility.htm
index 1101cc6..5635d48 100644
--- a/utility.htm
+++ b/utility.htm
@@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ typedef boost::result_of<
Technical Report,
N1836,
or, for motivation and design rationale,
- the result_of
proposal.
+ the
Usage guidelines for boost::result_of
diff --git a/value_init.htm b/value_init.htm
index b82792f..3222f69 100644
--- a/value_init.htm
+++ b/value_init.htm
@@ -159,10 +159,10 @@ the object shall be value-initialized (but see below). However, if a declara
The first Technical
+ href="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html">Technical
Corrigendum for the C++ Standard (TC1), whose draft was released to
the public in November 2001, introduced Core
+ href="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#178">Core
Issue 178 (among many other issues, of course).
That issue introduced the new concept of value-initialization