From 44a98b121b052f722b971a1d19531d1be7e83bff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Michel Morin Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:22:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Merge r86524 (Correct broken links to C++ standard papers); fixes #9212 [SVN r86673] --- utility.htm | 2 +- value_init.htm | 4 ++-- 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/utility.htm b/utility.htm index 1101cc6..5635d48 100644 --- a/utility.htm +++ b/utility.htm @@ -313,7 +313,7 @@ typedef boost::result_of< Technical Report, N1836, or, for motivation and design rationale, - the result_of proposal.

+ the result_of proposal.

Usage guidelines for boost::result_of

diff --git a/value_init.htm b/value_init.htm index b82792f..3222f69 100644 --- a/value_init.htm +++ b/value_init.htm @@ -159,10 +159,10 @@ the object shall be value-initialized (but see below). However, if a declara

value-initialization

The first Technical + href="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html">Technical Corrigendum for the C++ Standard (TC1), whose draft was released to the public in November 2001, introduced Core + href="http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_defects.html#178">Core Issue 178 (among many other issues, of course).

That issue introduced the new concept of value-initialization