From 4fe8f1505ffb69e285ac79650daa4f9eeb57d659 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dave Abrahams Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 05:58:21 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] added a missing word [SVN r11028] --- tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex b/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex index de8a944..12d3ce3 100644 --- a/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex +++ b/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex @@ -461,8 +461,8 @@ same iterator type, while in this case the return type would be \label{sec:iter-object-generator} Even though we now have a way to easily express the type of our -transform iterator, writing the type down at all is often more than -it is worth. The \stlconcept{AdaptableUnaryFunction}'s type alone +transform iterator, writing the type down at all is often more trouble +than it is worth. The \stlconcept{AdaptableUnaryFunction}'s type alone could be quite complex if it were generated using standard library facilities such as \code{std::bind1st}, \code{std::bind2nd}, or \code{std::ptr\_fun}. Declaring the entire transform iterator type