From ed2a21e1c7ef6244b260d39255f259046081fcdc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?h=C3=B6rbert?=
 <55799864+winzkigermany@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2021 11:43:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Don't return a hard coded errno in vfs_fat_access

Why should the return value of vfs_fat_access be hard coded as ENOENT?
This hides errors like FR_DISK_ERR of the lower layers.
---
 components/fatfs/vfs/vfs_fat.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/components/fatfs/vfs/vfs_fat.c b/components/fatfs/vfs/vfs_fat.c
index 37e060abcd..e797244a09 100644
--- a/components/fatfs/vfs/vfs_fat.c
+++ b/components/fatfs/vfs/vfs_fat.c
@@ -865,7 +865,7 @@ static int vfs_fat_access(void* ctx, const char *path, int amode)
         // it exists then it is readable and executable
     } else {
         ret = -1;
-        errno = ENOENT;
+        errno = fresult_to_errno(res);
     }
 
     return ret;