We used to use whatever precision we ended up having from C++'s
stdlib. However, some relatively popular tools, like Jenkins,
use Maven SureFire XML schema to validate JUnit test reports, and
Maven SureFire schema requires the duration to have at most 3
decimal places.
For compatibility, the JUnit reporter will now respect this
limitation.
Closes#2221
There is no good reason to provide a "add empty line" primitive
for writing XML documents, and the fact that it remains unused
after all the time it was provided only confirms this further.
This decreases code size and improves performance of passing around
`unique_ptr` instances by value somewhat. It virtually guarantees
problems when combining code compiled with Clang and GCC, but that
was never supported anyway.
In b7b346c3e5 this conditional was simplified to just
`while( false)` rather than the current one. Then in 3a33315ff8, that
change was reverted. I found it hard to understand this
complicated conditional, but after some digging in history I found this
comment which used to be here. It was removed in b7b346c3e5, but not
restored together with the revert in 3a33315ff8. Let's revive it.
It used to be part of the experimental benchmarking support, but
since that was replaced with proper benchmarking support with its
own timer facilities, it is now a dead code and useless.
The problem with the old name was that it collided with the
range matcher `Contains`, and it was not really possible to
disambiguate them just with argument types.
Closes#2131
This change also changes it so that test case macros using a
class name can have same name **and** tags as long as the
used class name differs.
Closes#1915Closes#1999
They now take `StringRef` as the argument, and are virtual only
in the basic interface.
Also cleaned out the various reporters and their overrides
of these members which were often empty or delegating up.
This means that e.g. for `TEST_CASE` with two sibling `SECTION`s
the event will fire twice, because the `TEST_CASE` will be entered
twice.
Closes#2107 (the event mentioned there already exists, but this
is its counterpart that we also want to provide to users)
This means that it can no longer be safely made ahead of time,
but nothing in our existing code used it like that. Normally it
is constructed and used in the same expression, which is now
more efficient.
Martin Hořeňovský
Anders Schau Knatten