feedc0de/boost_config
1
0
Fork 0
forked from boostorg/config
Code Pull Requests Activity

Avoided IBM/XL warning about omitted keyword "private" for base class "int_struct". Added note about IBM/XL V10.1 regression failure.

Browse Source 
[SVN r61332]
This commit is contained in:
Niels Dekker
2010-04-17 08:38:01 +00:00
parent 70f95b9245
commit 18af1c798d
1 changed files with 7 additions and 2 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

9
test/boost_no_com_value_init.ipp
View File

@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
// Note: its base class, int_struct, is there to try to reproduce GCC Bug 30111, // Note: its base class, int_struct, is there to try to reproduce GCC Bug 30111,
// "Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members", reported // "Value-initialization of POD base class doesn't initialize members", reported
// by Jonathan Wakely in 2006: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111 // by Jonathan Wakely in 2006: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30111
class value_initializer: int_struct class value_initializer: private int_struct
{ {
private: private:
enum_holder m_enum_holder; enum_holder m_enum_holder;
@@ -596,6 +596,11 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(derived_int_struct()) + FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(derived_int_struct()) +
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(char_array_struct()) + FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(char_array_struct()) +
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(int_array_pair()) + FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(int_array_pair()) +
// IBM's XL V10.1.0.0 may fail to value-initialize a temporary of a non-POD
// type like enum_holder_and_int, virtual_destructor_holder, or non_pod_class,
// as appeared at the Boost Config/trunk regression page in April 2010.
// Michael Wong (IBM Canada Ltd) confirmed the issue to me (Niels Dekker, LKEB),
// and gave it high priority.
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(enum_holder_and_int()) + FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(enum_holder_and_int()) +
FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(private_and_protected_int()) + FAILED_TO_VALUE_INITIALIZE(private_and_protected_int()) +
// The following line, doing user_defined_destructor_holder(), causes // The following line, doing user_defined_destructor_holder(), causes
@@ -681,7 +686,7 @@ namespace boost_no_complete_value_initialization
<< num_failures_on_heap << '+' << num_failures_on_heap << '+'
<< num_failures_of_temporaries << "): " << num_failures_of_temporaries << "): "
<< total_num_failures << total_num_failures
<< "\nDetected by boost_no_complete_value_initialization::test() revision 15." << "\nDetected by boost_no_complete_value_initialization::test() revision 16."
<< std::endl; << std::endl;
} }
return static_cast<int>(total_num_failures); return static_cast<int>(total_num_failures);