feedc0de/boost_conversion
1
0
Fork 0
forked from boostorg/conversion
Code Pull Requests Activity

Fixes #5723. Links in documentation are now implemented via [@boost: ]

Browse Source 
[SVN r73277]
This commit is contained in:
Antony Polukhin
2011-07-21 15:35:11 +00:00
parent c372f482a2
commit c1c8485cb4
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
doc/lexical_cast.qbk
View File

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
] ]
] ]
[def __numericcast__ [@http://www.boost.org/libs/numeric/conversion/doc/html/boost_numericconversion/improved_numeric_cast__.html `boost::numeric_cast`]] [def __numericcast__ [@boost:libs/numeric/conversion/doc/html/boost_numericconversion/improved_numeric_cast__.html `boost::numeric_cast`]]
[def __proposallong__ [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1973.html Lexical Conversion Library Proposal for TR2, N1973 by Kevlin Henney and Beman Dawes]] [def __proposallong__ [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1973.html Lexical Conversion Library Proposal for TR2, N1973 by Kevlin Henney and Beman Dawes]]
[def __proposalshort__ [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1973.html Lexical Conversion Library Proposal for TR2, N1973]] [def __proposalshort__ [@http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2006/n1973.html Lexical Conversion Library Proposal for TR2, N1973]]
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ The following example uses numeric data in a string expression:
[endsect] [endsect]
[section Synopsis] [section Synopsis]
Library features defined in [@http://www.boost.org/boost/lexical_cast.hpp boost/lexical_cast.hpp]: Library features defined in [@boost:boost/lexical_cast.hpp boost/lexical_cast.hpp]:
`` ``
namespace boost namespace boost
{ {
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ It breaks my `operator>>` that works only in presence of this flag. Can you remo
__proposallong__ to reset the flag but __proposallong__ to reset the flag but
remember that __proposalshort__ is not yet accepted by the committee. By the way, it's a great opportunity to remember that __proposalshort__ is not yet accepted by the committee. By the way, it's a great opportunity to
make your `operator>>` conform to the standard. make your `operator>>` conform to the standard.
Read a good C++ book, study `std::sentry` and [@../../libs/io/doc/ios_state.html `ios_state_saver`]. Read a good C++ book, study `std::sentry` and [@boost:libs/io/doc/ios_state.html `ios_state_saver`].
* [*Question:] Why `std::cout << boost::lexical_cast<unsigned int>("-1");` does not throw, but outputs 4294967295? * [*Question:] Why `std::cout << boost::lexical_cast<unsigned int>("-1");` does not throw, but outputs 4294967295?