From c48432531061fa54fce1acd01c5f463d0066753e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Antony Polukhin Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2012 16:30:41 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix FAQ section of lexical_cast documentation (refs #7582) [SVN r81069] --- doc/lexical_cast.qbk | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/lexical_cast.qbk b/doc/lexical_cast.qbk index ddc0e06..1be027e 100644 --- a/doc/lexical_cast.qbk +++ b/doc/lexical_cast.qbk @@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ It breaks my `operator>>` that works only in presence of this flag. Can you remo * [*Answer:] May be in a future version. There is no requirement in __proposallong__ to reset the flag but remember that __proposalshort__ is not yet accepted by the committee. By the way, it's a great opportunity to -make your `operator>>` conform to the standard. +make your `operator>>` more general. Read a good C++ book, study `std::sentry` and [@boost:libs/io/doc/ios_state.html `ios_state_saver`]. [pre