From 484c63531691c53855601accfd194bc64f661815 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Beman
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:43:45 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Tweak the "Why are only big and little native endianness
supported?" FAQ entry wording.
---
doc/index.html | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/index.html b/doc/index.html
index 4c66d48..6145876 100644
--- a/doc/index.html
+++ b/doc/index.html
@@ -439,8 +439,9 @@ gives more pros and cons.
and the other middle endian approaches are interesting historical curiosities
but have no relevance to today's C++ developers. The
specification for native
-ordering is carefully crafted to allow implementations to support other
-orderings, thanks to Howard Hinnant.
+ordering has been carefully crafted to allow support for other
+orderings in the future, should the need arise. Thanks to Howard Hinnant for
+suggesting draft standarese.
Why do both the buffer and arithmetic types exist?
@@ -609,7 +610,7 @@ Blechmann, Tim Moore, tymofey, Tomas Puverle, Vincente Botet, Yuval Ronen and
Vitaly Budovsk. Apologies if anyone has been missed.
Last revised:
-14 October, 2015
+16 October, 2015
© Copyright Beman Dawes, 2011, 2013
Distributed under the Boost Software License, Version 1.0. See
www.boost.org/ LICENSE_1_0.txt