From de377710d48ed43b2a44cff3c9dbf6a5bfcac234 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Joel Falcou Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2011 07:07:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Applied documentation patch from Daniel James. Fix Ticket #5240 [SVN r71159] --- doc/tutorial/apply-lambda-semantics.html | 2 +- doc/tutorial/numeric-metafunction.html | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/doc/tutorial/apply-lambda-semantics.html b/doc/tutorial/apply-lambda-semantics.html index 154ff86..2e60b55 100644 --- a/doc/tutorial/apply-lambda-semantics.html +++ b/doc/tutorial/apply-lambda-semantics.html @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ one.

To get a detailed picture of the new apply/lambda semantics, please see the test case at -http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/mpl/test/apply.cpp?view=markup +libs/mpl/test/apply.cpp and the corresponding sections of the MPL reference manual.

diff --git a/doc/tutorial/numeric-metafunction.html b/doc/tutorial/numeric-metafunction.html index 8a6dcb4..6a78fa0 100644 --- a/doc/tutorial/numeric-metafunction.html +++ b/doc/tutorial/numeric-metafunction.html @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ arguments of different types, and the result will yield the largest/most general of the argument types. The infrastructure allows user-defined numeric types to be freely intermixed with predefined library types. See -http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/mpl/test/numeric_ops.cpp?view=markup +libs/mpl/test/numeric_ops.cpp for an illustrative example, and the reference manual for the formal infrastructure specification.

If you were using MPL numeric metafunctions on your own integral