[section:style_guide Terminology and style guidelines]
The use of a consistent terminology is as important for __ranges__ and range-based algorithms as it is for iterators and iterator-based algorithms. If a conventional set of names are adopted, we can avoid misunderstandings and write generic function prototypes that are [*/self-documenting/].
Since ranges are characterized by a specific underlying iterator type, we get a type of range for each type of iterator. Hence we can speak of the following types of ranges:
Notice how we have used the categories from the __new_style_iterators__.
Notice that an iterator (and therefore an range) has one [*/traversal/] property and one or more properties from the [*/value access/] category. So in reality we will mostly talk about mixtures such as
By convention, we should always specify the [*/traversal/] property first as done above. This seems reasonable since there will only be one [*/traversal/] property, but perhaps many [*/value access/] properties.
It might, however, be reasonable to specify only one category if the other category does not matter. For example, the __iterator_range__ can be constructed from a Forward Range. This means that we do not care about what [*/value access/] properties the Range has. Similarly, a Readable Range will be one that has the lowest possible [*/traversal/] property (Single Pass).
As another example, consider how we specify the interface of `std::sort()`. Algorithms are usually more cumbersome to specify the interface of since both [*/traversal/] and [*/value access/] properties must be exactly defined. The iterator-based version looks like this:
``
template< class RandomAccessTraversalReadableWritableIterator >