Boost.Range updated the return types of various algorithms to improve consistency. This is to address a specific request made during the formal review of Boost.RangeEx.

[SVN r61211]
This commit is contained in:
Neil Groves
2010-04-11 22:05:02 +00:00
parent cab01e8ba3
commit 350a1f8bfc
108 changed files with 937 additions and 605 deletions

View File

@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
situations, you will really appreciate the succinctness of <code class="computeroutput"><span class="keyword">operator</span><span class="special">|()</span></code>.
</p>
<a name="range.reference.adaptors.adaptors_introduction.composition_of_adaptors"></a><h6>
<a name="id2873037"></a>
<a name="id3026637"></a>
<a class="link" href="adaptors_introduction.html#range.reference.adaptors.adaptors_introduction.composition_of_adaptors">Composition
of Adaptors</a>
</h6>
@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
is the design solution to this problem.
</p>
<a name="range.reference.adaptors.adaptors_introduction.range_adaptor_alternative_to_copy_if_algorithm"></a><h6>
<a name="id2873347"></a>
<a name="id3026947"></a>
<a class="link" href="adaptors_introduction.html#range.reference.adaptors.adaptors_introduction.range_adaptor_alternative_to_copy_if_algorithm">Range
Adaptor alternative to copy_if algorithm</a>
</h6>
@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
<p>
</p>
<a name="range.reference.adaptors.adaptors_introduction.range_adaptor_alternative_to_count_if_algorithm"></a><h6>
<a name="id2873516"></a>
<a name="id3027116"></a>
<a class="link" href="adaptors_introduction.html#range.reference.adaptors.adaptors_introduction.range_adaptor_alternative_to_count_if_algorithm">Range
Adaptor alternative to count_if algorithm</a>
</h6>