forked from boostorg/range
merged from trunk
[SVN r47983]
This commit is contained in:
+2
-2
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@
|
||||
<li >
|
||||
<i>Why is there no difference between <code >range_iterator<C>::type</code>
|
||||
and <code >range_const_iterator<C>::type</code> for <code>std::pair<iterator, iterator></code></i>.
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
|
||||
<p >
|
||||
In general it is not possible nor desirable to find a corresponding <code >const_iterator</code>.
|
||||
When it is possible to come up with one, the client might choose to construct a <code >std::pair<const_iterator,const_iterator></code>
|
||||
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
|
||||
is somewhat more convenient than a <code>pair</code> and that a <a
|
||||
href="utility_class.html#sub_range"><code>sub_range</code></a> does
|
||||
propagate const-ness. </p>
|
||||
|
||||
</li>
|
||||
<li >
|
||||
<i>Why is there not supplied more types or more functions?</i>
|
||||
<p >
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user