Fix constexpr when using libstdc++

This commit is contained in:
Krystian Stasiowski
2020-02-01 23:18:20 -05:00
parent 4d8d35acc8
commit 24c7f1e027
2 changed files with 15 additions and 19 deletions

View File

@ -146,10 +146,12 @@ defined(__clang__) && \
#define BOOST_STATIC_STRING_CPP14_CONSTEXPR
#endif
// For clang and msvc, constexpr does not work with library
// comparison function objects.
#if (defined(__clang__) && (__clang_major__ < 9)) || \
(defined(_MSVC_LANG) && !defined(BOOST_STATIC_STRING_CPP20))
// These are for compiler/library configurations
// that cannot use the library comparison function
// objects at all in constant expresssions. In these
// cases, we use whatever will make more constexpr work.
#if (defined(__clang__) && defined(__GLIBCXX__) && \
((__GLIBCXX__ > 20181206) && (__GLIBCXX__ < 20190812)))
#define BOOST_STATIC_STRING_NO_PTR_COMP_FUNCTIONS
#endif
@ -165,16 +167,6 @@ defined(__clang__) && \
#include <string_view>
#endif
#ifdef __clang__
#include <new>
#define STRING_VALUE(...) STRING_VALUE__(__VA_ARGS__)
#define STRING_VALUE__(...) #__VA_ARGS__
#pragma message("STATIC STRING CLANG DEBUG INFO")
#pragma message("LIBSTDCXX OLD: " STRING_VALUE(__GLIBCPP__))
#pragma message("LIBSTDCXX NEW: " STRING_VALUE(__GLIBCXX__))
#pragma message("LIBCXX: " STRING_VALUE(_LIBCPP_VERSION))
#endif
namespace boost {
namespace static_string {

View File

@ -509,7 +509,7 @@ to_static_string_float_impl(Floating value) noexcept
{
// extra one needed for null terminator
char buffer[N + 1];
std::sprintf(buffer, "%f", value);
std::sprintf(buffer, "%Lf", value);
// this will not throw
return static_string<N>(buffer);
}
@ -521,7 +521,7 @@ to_static_wstring_float_impl(Floating value) noexcept
{
// extra one needed for null terminator
wchar_t buffer[N + 1];
std::swprintf(buffer, N + 1, L"%f", value);
std::swprintf(buffer, N + 1, L"%Lf", value);
// this will not throw
return static_wstring<N>(buffer);
}
@ -611,6 +611,9 @@ is_inside(
// while retaining the guarentee that the comparison has a strict total ordering.
// We also want this to be fast. Since different compilers have differing levels
// of conformance, we will settle for the best option that is available.
// We don't care about this in C++11, since this function would have
// no applications in constant expressions.
#ifdef BOOST_STATIC_STRING_CPP14
#ifdef BOOST_STATIC_STRING_NO_PTR_COMP_FUNCTIONS
#ifdef BOOST_STATIC_STRING_USE_IS_CONST_EVAL
// Our second best option is to use is_constant_evaluated
@ -624,11 +627,12 @@ is_inside(
return false;
}
#else
// If library comparison functions don't work, then
// its almost certain that we can use the builtin
// comparison operator instead.
// If library comparison functions don't work, and
// we cannot use is_constant_evaluated, we can use
// the builtin comparison operators instead.
return ptr >= src_first && ptr <= src_last;
#endif
#endif
#endif
// Use the library comparison functions if we can't use
// is_constant_evaluated or if we don't need to.