From a60e25a74db6dbd2eb03a113dcf1c5c488f13599 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Antony Polukhin <antoshkka@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 09:09:37 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] Better diagnostics for missing PRETTY_FUNCTION macro (refs
 #24)

---
 include/boost/type_index/detail/compile_time_type_info.hpp | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/boost/type_index/detail/compile_time_type_info.hpp b/include/boost/type_index/detail/compile_time_type_info.hpp
index 7a55350..53eca33 100644
--- a/include/boost/type_index/detail/compile_time_type_info.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/type_index/detail/compile_time_type_info.hpp
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ struct ctti {
                     || defined(__DMC__)
         constexpr unsigned int size = sizeof(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
     #else
-        boost::typeindex::detail::failed_to_get_function_name();
+        boost::typeindex::detail::failed_to_get_function_name<T>();
     #endif
 
         boost::typeindex::detail::assert_compile_time_legths<
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ struct ctti {
                 || defined(__DMC__)
         return boost::typeindex::detail::skip_begining< sizeof(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__) >(__PRETTY_FUNCTION__);
     #else
-        boost::typeindex::detail::failed_to_get_function_name();
+        boost::typeindex::detail::failed_to_get_function_name<T>();
         return "";
     #endif
     }