From 38f9545757b8df0d63c67d7f04b867a057d11fe7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jzmaddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 13:37:11 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] is_member_function_pointer_cxx_11.hpp: and another attempt to
 get the clang OS X logic correct.

---
 .../type_traits/detail/is_member_function_pointer_cxx_11.hpp    | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/boost/type_traits/detail/is_member_function_pointer_cxx_11.hpp b/include/boost/type_traits/detail/is_member_function_pointer_cxx_11.hpp
index d754109..e6f5ce2 100644
--- a/include/boost/type_traits/detail/is_member_function_pointer_cxx_11.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/type_traits/detail/is_member_function_pointer_cxx_11.hpp
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ namespace boost {
    template <class T>
    struct is_member_function_pointer<T const volatile> : public is_member_function_pointer<T> {};
 
-#if defined(BOOST_TT_NO_DEDUCED_NOEXCEPT_PARAM) && !defined(BOOST_TT_NO_NOEXCEPT_SEPARATE_TYPE)
+#if defined(BOOST_TT_NO_DEDUCED_NOEXCEPT_PARAM)
    // MSVC can't handle noexcept(b) as a deduced template parameter 
    // so we will have to write everything out :(
 #define BOOST_TT_NOEXCEPT_PARAM