From eca24d4e5a682e7163476fb121f11d0e0354c002 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: John Maddock <john@johnmaddock.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 10:36:17 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Revised test cases were too strict for boken compilers, add a
 note instead, and only run the full tests for functioning compilers.

[SVN r29435]
---
 test/is_function_test.cpp | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/test/is_function_test.cpp b/test/is_function_test.cpp
index ee28191..f92a97d 100644
--- a/test/is_function_test.cpp
+++ b/test/is_function_test.cpp
@@ -28,7 +28,14 @@ BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<foo4_t>::value, true);
 
 BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<void>::value, false);
 BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<int>::value, false);
+#if !defined(BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION)
 BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<int&>::value, false);
+#else
+std::cout << 
+"<note>is_function will fail with some types (references for example)"
+"if the compiler doesn't support partial specialisation of class templates."
+"These are *not* tested here</note>" << std::endl;
+#endif
 BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<int*>::value, false);
 BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<int[]>::value, false);
 BOOST_CHECK_INTEGRAL_CONSTANT(::tt::is_function<test_abc1>::value, false);