forked from boostorg/unordered
Some more typos
This commit is contained in:
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ containers in the draft standard, so the interface was fixed. But there are
|
|||||||
still some implementation decisions to make. The priorities are
|
still some implementation decisions to make. The priorities are
|
||||||
conformance to the standard and portability.
|
conformance to the standard and portability.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table wikipedia article on hash tables]
|
The [@http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hash_table Wikipedia article on hash tables]
|
||||||
has a good summary of the implementation issues for hash tables in general.
|
has a good summary of the implementation issues for hash tables in general.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[h2 Data Structure]
|
[h2 Data Structure]
|
||||||
@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ knowledge of the number of bits in the hash value, so it isn't portable enough
|
|||||||
to use as a default. It can applicable in certain cases so the containers
|
to use as a default. It can applicable in certain cases so the containers
|
||||||
have a policy based implementation that can use this alternative technique.
|
have a policy based implementation that can use this alternative technique.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Currently this is only done on 64 bit architecures, where prime number
|
Currently this is only done on 64 bit architectures, where prime number
|
||||||
modulus can be expensive. Although this varies depending on the architecture,
|
modulus can be expensive. Although this varies depending on the architecture,
|
||||||
so I probably should revisit it.
|
so I probably should revisit it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user