From 5b716a8b199bc8ebd2e928e9958e7d561766c6cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeremy Siek Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001 19:32:35 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] small edit [SVN r10316] --- tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex b/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex index 70b4c4b..6bbcc68 100644 --- a/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex +++ b/tmpw2001-paper/iter-adaptor.tex @@ -751,7 +751,7 @@ iterator categories derived from the standard ones. \subsubsection{Implementation of \code{operator[]}} The implementation of \code{operator[]} would be trivial except for -the issue surrounding what the return type should be. As discussed in +the issue surrounding what the return type should be. As mentioned in \S\ref{sec:iterator-bracket}, it would be dangerous to make the \code{iterator\_adaptor} always return a reference for \code{operator[]} for there are certain situations in which this can