Files
mp-units/test/unit_test/static/quantity_test.cpp

259 lines
12 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

2018-08-22 12:11:19 +02:00
// The MIT License (MIT)
//
// Copyright (c) 2018 Mateusz Pusz
//
// Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy
// of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal
// in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights
// to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell
// copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is
// furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
//
// The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all
// copies or substantial portions of the Software.
//
// THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
// IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
// FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE
// AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER
// LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM,
// OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
// SOFTWARE.
#include "units/math.h"
#include "units/physical/si/area.h"
#include "units/physical/si/frequency.h"
#include "units/physical/si/velocity.h"
2020-05-08 21:18:16 +02:00
#include "units/physical/si/volume.h"
2018-09-28 10:53:21 -07:00
#include <chrono>
#include <utility>
2018-10-19 13:02:58 +02:00
2018-09-28 07:47:37 -07:00
namespace {
using namespace units;
using namespace units::si;
// class invariants
// constexpr quantity<si::dim_length, second, int> error(0); // should not compile (unit of a different dimension)
// constexpr quantity<si::dim_length, metre, quantity<si::dim_length, metre, int>> error(0); // should not compile (quantity used as Rep)
// constexpr quantity<metre, si::dim_length, double> error(0); // should not compile (reordered arguments)
// constexpr quantity<si::dim_length, scaled_unit<ratio<-1, 1>, metre>, int> error(0); // should not compile (negative unit ratio)
// member types
static_assert(std::is_same_v<length<metre, int>::rep, int>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<length<metre, double>::rep, double>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<length<metre, int>::unit, metre>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<length<kilometre, int>::unit, kilometre>);
// constructors
static_assert(length<metre, int>().count() == 0);
constexpr length<metre, int> km{1000};
static_assert(km.count() == 1000);
static_assert(length<metre, int>(km).count() == km.count());
static_assert(length<metre, int>(1).count() == 1);
// static_assert(length<metre, int>(1.0).count() == 1); // should not compile (truncating conversion)
static_assert(length<metre, double>(1.0).count() == 1.0);
static_assert(length<metre, double>(1).count() == 1.0);
static_assert(length<metre, double>(3.14).count() == 3.14);
static_assert(length<metre, int>(km).count() == 1000);
// static_assert(length<metre, int>(length<metre, double>(3.14)).count() == 3); // should not compile (truncating conversion)
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(length<metre, double>(1000.0q_m).count() == 1000.0);
static_assert(length<metre, double>(km).count() == 1000.0);
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(length<metre, int>(1q_km).count() == 1000);
// static_assert(length<metre, int>(1q_s).count() == 1); // should not compile (different dimensions)
//static_assert(length<kilometre, int>(1010q_m).count() == 1); // should not compile (truncating conversion)
// assignment operator
static_assert([]() { length<metre, int> l1(1), l2(2); return l2 = l1; }().count() == 1);
// static member functions
static_assert(length<metre, int>::zero().count() == 0);
static_assert(length<metre, int>::min().count() == std::numeric_limits<int>::lowest());
static_assert(length<metre, int>::max().count() == std::numeric_limits<int>::max());
static_assert(length<metre, double>::zero().count() == 0.0);
static_assert(length<metre, double>::min().count() == std::numeric_limits<double>::lowest());
static_assert(length<metre, double>::max().count() == std::numeric_limits<double>::max());
// unary member operators
static_assert((+km).count() == 1000);
static_assert((-km).count() == -1000);
static_assert((+(-km)).count() == -1000);
static_assert((-(-km)).count() == 1000);
// binary member operators
static_assert([](auto v) {
auto vv = v++;
return std::make_pair(v, vv);
}(km) == std::make_pair(length<metre, int>(1001), length<metre, int>(1000)));
static_assert([](auto v) {
auto vv = ++v;
return std::make_pair(v, vv);
}(km) == std::make_pair(length<metre, int>(1001), length<metre, int>(1001)));
static_assert([](auto v) {
auto vv = v--;
return std::make_pair(v, vv);
}(km) == std::make_pair(length<metre, int>(999), length<metre, int>(1000)));
static_assert([](auto v) {
auto vv = --v;
return std::make_pair(v, vv);
}(km) == std::make_pair(length<metre, int>(999), length<metre, int>(999)));
// compound assignment
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert((1q_m += 1q_m).count() == 2);
static_assert((2q_m -= 1q_m).count() == 1);
static_assert((1q_m *= 2).count() == 2);
static_assert((2q_m /= 2).count() == 1);
static_assert((7q_m %= 2).count() == 1);
static_assert((7q_m %= 2q_m).count() == 1);
// static_assert((7.m %= 2.).count() == 1); // should not compile (operation not allowed for floating-point types)
// static_assert((7.m %= 2).count() == 1); // should not compile (operation not allowed for floating-point types)
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
// static_assert((7q_m %= 2.).count() == 1); // should not compile (operation not allowed for floating-point types)
static_assert((7q_m %= 2q_m).count() == 1);
// static_assert((7.m %= 2.m).count() == 1); // should not compile (operation not allowed for floating-point types)
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
// static_assert((7.m %= 2q_m).count() == 1); // should not compile (operation not allowed for floating-point types)
// static_assert((7q_m %= 2.m).count() == 1); // should not compile (operation not allowed for floating-point types)
2018-09-28 07:47:37 -07:00
// non-member arithmetic operators
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() + length<metre, double>()), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() + length<metre, double>()), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(
std::is_same_v<decltype(length<kilometre, int>() + length<metre, double>()), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, double>() - length<metre, int>()), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(
std::is_same_v<decltype(length<kilometre, double>() - length<metre, int>()), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() * 1.0), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(1.0 * length<metre, int>()), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(
std::is_same_v<decltype(velocity<metre_per_second, int>() * si::time<second, int>()), length<metre, int>>);
static_assert(
implementing ratio<num,den,exp> which replaces ratio<num,den> https://github.com/mpusz/units/issues/14 This "works", as in it passes all static and runtime tests. However quite a few of the tests have been "modified" to make them pass. Whether this is legitimate is debatable and should be the source of some thought / discussion. 1. many of the static tests and some of the runtime tests have had the input ratios of the tests modified in the following way. eg ratio<3,1000> => ratio<3,1,-3>. ie they have been "canonicalised". There are obviously an infinite number of ratios which represent the same rational number. The way `ratio` is implemented it always moves as "many powers of 10" from the `num` and `den` into the `exp` and that makes the `canonical` ratio. Because these are all "types" and the lib uses is_same all over the place, only exact matches will be `is_same`. ie ratio<300,4,0> !is_same ratio<3,4,2> (the latter is the canonical ratio). This is perhaps fine for tests in the devlopment phase, but there may be a need for "more forgiving" comparison / concept of value equality. One such comparison which compares den,num,exp after canonicalisation is the constexpr function `same` as defined at top of `ratio_test.cpp`. We may need to expose this and perhaps add even more soft comparisions. 2. In the runtime tests it is "subjective" how some resukts should be printed. There is the question of "how exactly to format certain ratios". eg omit denominators of "1" and exponents of "0". However before even addressing these in detail a decision needs to be made about the general form of "non-floating-point-converted" ratios which do not map exactly to a "Symbol prefix". Arguably these are "relatively ugly" whatever we do, so we could just go for an easily canonicalised form. An example is: - CHECK(stream.str() == "10 [1/60]W"); + CHECK(stream.str() == "10 [1/6 x 10⁻¹]W"); Which of thses is "better"? Is there a "third", better form? It's not obvious. My opnion is: Both of 1&2 are fine for now, unless we think they go down the wrong avenue, and can be "perfected later"? ie we can expose a softer version of ratio based equality, and decide on canonical way of printing ratios (as far as that is actually a very useful output form, compared with decimal, scientific or engineering notation).
2019-12-27 18:49:43 +00:00
std::is_same_v<decltype(velocity<metre_per_second, int>() * si::time<hour, int>()), length<scaled_unit<ratio<36, 1, 2>, metre>, int>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre>() * si::time<minute>()),
quantity<unknown_dimension<units::exp<dim_length, 1>, units::exp<dim_time, 1>>, scaled_unit<ratio<6, 1, 1>, unknown_coherent_unit>>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(1 / si::time<second, int>()), frequency<hertz, int>>);
implementing ratio<num,den,exp> which replaces ratio<num,den> https://github.com/mpusz/units/issues/14 This "works", as in it passes all static and runtime tests. However quite a few of the tests have been "modified" to make them pass. Whether this is legitimate is debatable and should be the source of some thought / discussion. 1. many of the static tests and some of the runtime tests have had the input ratios of the tests modified in the following way. eg ratio<3,1000> => ratio<3,1,-3>. ie they have been "canonicalised". There are obviously an infinite number of ratios which represent the same rational number. The way `ratio` is implemented it always moves as "many powers of 10" from the `num` and `den` into the `exp` and that makes the `canonical` ratio. Because these are all "types" and the lib uses is_same all over the place, only exact matches will be `is_same`. ie ratio<300,4,0> !is_same ratio<3,4,2> (the latter is the canonical ratio). This is perhaps fine for tests in the devlopment phase, but there may be a need for "more forgiving" comparison / concept of value equality. One such comparison which compares den,num,exp after canonicalisation is the constexpr function `same` as defined at top of `ratio_test.cpp`. We may need to expose this and perhaps add even more soft comparisions. 2. In the runtime tests it is "subjective" how some resukts should be printed. There is the question of "how exactly to format certain ratios". eg omit denominators of "1" and exponents of "0". However before even addressing these in detail a decision needs to be made about the general form of "non-floating-point-converted" ratios which do not map exactly to a "Symbol prefix". Arguably these are "relatively ugly" whatever we do, so we could just go for an easily canonicalised form. An example is: - CHECK(stream.str() == "10 [1/60]W"); + CHECK(stream.str() == "10 [1/6 x 10⁻¹]W"); Which of thses is "better"? Is there a "third", better form? It's not obvious. My opnion is: Both of 1&2 are fine for now, unless we think they go down the wrong avenue, and can be "perfected later"? ie we can expose a softer version of ratio based equality, and decide on canonical way of printing ratios (as far as that is actually a very useful output form, compared with decimal, scientific or engineering notation).
2019-12-27 18:49:43 +00:00
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(1 / si::time<minute, int>()), frequency<scaled_unit<ratio<1, 6, -1>, hertz>, int>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(1 / frequency<hertz, int>()), si::time<second, int>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(1 / length<kilometre>()),
quantity<unknown_dimension<units::exp<dim_length, -1>>, scaled_unit<ratio<1, 1, -3>, unknown_coherent_unit>>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() / 1.0), length<metre, double>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() / length<metre, double>()), double>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<kilometre, int>() / length<metre, double>()), double>);
static_assert(
std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() / si::time<second, int>()), velocity<metre_per_second, int>>);
static_assert(
implementing ratio<num,den,exp> which replaces ratio<num,den> https://github.com/mpusz/units/issues/14 This "works", as in it passes all static and runtime tests. However quite a few of the tests have been "modified" to make them pass. Whether this is legitimate is debatable and should be the source of some thought / discussion. 1. many of the static tests and some of the runtime tests have had the input ratios of the tests modified in the following way. eg ratio<3,1000> => ratio<3,1,-3>. ie they have been "canonicalised". There are obviously an infinite number of ratios which represent the same rational number. The way `ratio` is implemented it always moves as "many powers of 10" from the `num` and `den` into the `exp` and that makes the `canonical` ratio. Because these are all "types" and the lib uses is_same all over the place, only exact matches will be `is_same`. ie ratio<300,4,0> !is_same ratio<3,4,2> (the latter is the canonical ratio). This is perhaps fine for tests in the devlopment phase, but there may be a need for "more forgiving" comparison / concept of value equality. One such comparison which compares den,num,exp after canonicalisation is the constexpr function `same` as defined at top of `ratio_test.cpp`. We may need to expose this and perhaps add even more soft comparisions. 2. In the runtime tests it is "subjective" how some resukts should be printed. There is the question of "how exactly to format certain ratios". eg omit denominators of "1" and exponents of "0". However before even addressing these in detail a decision needs to be made about the general form of "non-floating-point-converted" ratios which do not map exactly to a "Symbol prefix". Arguably these are "relatively ugly" whatever we do, so we could just go for an easily canonicalised form. An example is: - CHECK(stream.str() == "10 [1/60]W"); + CHECK(stream.str() == "10 [1/6 x 10⁻¹]W"); Which of thses is "better"? Is there a "third", better form? It's not obvious. My opnion is: Both of 1&2 are fine for now, unless we think they go down the wrong avenue, and can be "perfected later"? ie we can expose a softer version of ratio based equality, and decide on canonical way of printing ratios (as far as that is actually a very useful output form, compared with decimal, scientific or engineering notation).
2019-12-27 18:49:43 +00:00
std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre>() / si::time<minute>()), velocity<scaled_unit<ratio<1, 6, -1>, metre_per_second>>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(si::time<minute>() / length<metre>()),
quantity<unknown_dimension<units::exp<dim_length, -1>, units::exp<dim_time, 1>>, scaled_unit<ratio<6 ,1 , 1>, unknown_coherent_unit>>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() % short(1)), length<metre, int>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(length<metre, int>() % length<metre, short>(1)), length<metre, int>>);
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert((1q_m + km).count() == 1001);
static_assert((1q_m + 1q_km).count() == 1001);
static_assert((km - 1q_m).count() == 999);
static_assert((1q_km - 1q_m).count() == 999);
static_assert((2q_m * 2).count() == 4);
static_assert((3 * 3q_m).count() == 9);
static_assert((4q_m / 2).count() == 2);
static_assert(4q_m / 2q_m == 2);
static_assert(4q_km / 2000q_m == 2);
static_assert((7q_m % 2).count() == 1);
static_assert((7q_m % 2q_m).count() == 1);
static_assert((7q_km % 2000q_m).count() == 1000);
static_assert((10q_km2 * 10q_km2) / 50q_km2 == 2q_km2);
// comparators
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(2q_m + 1q_m == 3q_m);
static_assert(!(2q_m + 2q_m == 3q_m));
static_assert(2q_m + 2q_m != 3q_m);
static_assert(!(2q_m + 2q_m != 4q_m));
static_assert(2q_m > 1q_m);
static_assert(!(1q_m > 1q_m));
static_assert(1q_m < 2q_m);
static_assert(!(2q_m < 2q_m));
static_assert(2q_m >= 1q_m);
static_assert(2q_m >= 2q_m);
static_assert(!(2q_m >= 3q_m));
static_assert(1q_m <= 2q_m);
static_assert(2q_m <= 2q_m);
static_assert(!(3q_m <= 2q_m));
static_assert(3q_m == 3.0q_m);
static_assert(3q_m != 3.14q_m);
static_assert(2q_m > 1.0q_m);
static_assert(1.0q_m < 2q_m);
static_assert(2.0q_m >= 1q_m);
static_assert(1q_m <= 2.0q_m);
static_assert(1000q_m == 1q_km);
static_assert(1001q_m != 1q_km);
static_assert(1001q_m > 1q_km);
static_assert(999q_m < 1q_km);
static_assert(1000q_m >= 1q_km);
static_assert(1000q_m <= 1q_km);
2020-05-08 21:18:16 +02:00
// alias units
static_assert(2q_l + 2q_ml == 2002q_ml);
static_assert(2q_l + 2q_ml == 2002q_cm3);
static_assert(2q_l + 2q_cm3 == 2002q_ml);
static_assert(2q_dm3 + 2q_cm3 == 2002q_ml);
// is_quantity
static_assert(Quantity<length<millimetre, int>>);
// common_quantity
static_assert(std::is_same_v<common_quantity<length<metre, int>, length<kilometre, int>>, length<metre, int>>);
static_assert(
std::is_same_v<common_quantity<length<kilometre, long long>, length<metre, int>>, length<metre, long long>>);
static_assert(std::is_same_v<common_quantity<length<kilometre, long long>, length<millimetre, double>>,
length<millimetre, double>>);
// quantity_cast
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(quantity_cast<scaled_unit<ratio<1>, metre>>(2q_km))::unit, metre>);
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(quantity_cast<length<metre, int>>(2q_km).count() == 2000);
static_assert(quantity_cast<length<kilometre, int>>(2000q_m).count() == 2);
static_assert(quantity_cast<length<metre, int>>(1.23q_m).count() == 1);
static_assert(quantity_cast<metre>(2q_km).count() == 2000);
static_assert(quantity_cast<kilometre>(2000q_m).count() == 2);
static_assert(quantity_cast<int>(1.23q_m).count() == 1);
// time
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
// static_assert(1q_s == 1q_m); // should not compile (different dimensions)
static_assert(1q_h == 3600q_s);
// length
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(1q_km == 1000q_m);
static_assert(1q_km + 1q_m == 1001q_m);
static_assert(10q_km / 5q_km == 2);
static_assert(10q_km / 2 == 5q_km);
// velocity
2020-03-10 20:53:53 +01:00
static_assert(10q_m / 5q_s == 2q_m_per_s);
static_assert(10 / 5q_s * 1q_m == 2q_m_per_s);
static_assert(1q_km / 1q_s == 1000q_m_per_s);
static_assert(2q_km_per_h * 2q_h == 4q_km);
static_assert(2q_km / 2q_km_per_h == 1q_h);
2020-02-17 15:56:06 +01:00
static_assert(std::is_same_v<decltype(pow<2>(2q_m)), decltype(4q_m2)>);
2018-09-28 07:47:37 -07:00
} // namespace