For the specification see:
<https://github.com/rook/rook/blob/master/design/ceph/object/swift-and-keystone-integration.md>
* extend the API object specs for swift and keystone integration
* adapt rgw to the new go-ceph version
- The parameter lists of the API call have changes, as parameters
ignored by the RGW Admin Ops API are no longer serialized, therefore
the mock has to be adapted.
- There is now validation for the user keys that are passed to the
User get API, therefore things failed when we had empty keys in our
User proxy object.
* expand the reconcile loop for the swift and keystone integration
* fix minor mistakes in design document
* add env var to pass extra args to minikube
Minikube decides CPU cores and memory automatically based on the
available resources on the machine which may be insufficient to
run rook. This commit adds an environment variable to add arbitrary
arguments to the minikube command, so both can be specified if
desired.
* integration tests for swift and keystone
The new integration of swift or s3 and keystone support by rook
does not have any integration tests yet.
This commit introduces integration tests for swift and keystone. The
tests are done against a minimal keystone setup (keystone container
image from Yaook-project (https://yaook.cloud), sqlite as database
backend, cert-manager and trust-manager for test certificate setup).
To prevent hardcoded credentials, passwords are generated
by the tests. The integration tests use the openstack client
(keystone- and swift-functionality) (https://docs.openstack.org/
python-openstackclient/ latest/). This was a concious design decision
to use client tooling as close as possible to the end user instead of
using other go-libraries (such as gophercloud).
* add documentation on swift and keystone
Currently there is no documentation on the use of Swift to access
an object store as well as the use of OpenStack keystone for
authentication.
This commit adds documentation on the use of Swift and OpenStack
keystone, as well as CRD-related documentation and an example setup.
* add integration tests for S3 via keystone
This commit introduces integration tests for s3 and keystone. The
tests are run against the same minimal keystone setup that the tests
for swift and keystone use.
The integration tests use the aws s3 client to use client tooling as
close as possible to the end user instead of using other go-libraries.
Co-authored-by: Jan Klippel <jan.klippel@uhurutec.com>
Co-authored-by: Silvio Ankermann <silvio.ankermann@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Riese <sebastian.riese@cloudandheat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Klippel <jan.klippel@uhurutec.com>
Signed-off-by: Silvio Ankermann <silvio.ankermann@cloudandheat.com>
RGW can only serve a single certificate. This limitation means that the
prior behavior of using the default service for admin ops when TLS is
enabled may mean it requires additional complex certificate management
to make sure the object store uses a certificate valid for Rook internal
admin ops and user connections.
This is needlessly complex for users. Instead, change Rook's behavior
and documentation to clarify that it will use the same endpoint intended
for S3 client applications. This means that users have a more
straightforward path to enabling both Rook and consuming applications.
More info: https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/14530
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
Add CephObjectStore spec.hosting.advertiseEndpoint configuration. This
provides a clear documented default for which endpoint Rook "advertises"
to dependent resources like CephObjectStores, OBCs, and COSI
Buckets/Accesses and allows users to override the default behavior if
desired.
The current default is to round-robin an endpoint from
spec.hosting.dnsNames, which has proven to be troublesome for some
users' object store configurations. This change provides much-needed
disambiguation for users.
This may be a breaking change for some existing spec.hosting.dnsNames
users. This is unexpected but is documented.
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
The omap data for multipart uploads is stored in an
additional data pool, which cannot be an EC pool.
So the extra data pool is set to the metadata pool
for object stores with shared pools.
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
For image mode mirroring, if cephBlockPool.Pool.Spec.Mirroring.Enable
is set to false, then remove the peer cluster and disable mirroring on
all the pool if the user has disabled mirroring on all the pool images.
If mirroring is not disabled on all the pool images, then reconcile will
fail asking the users to manually disable mirroring on those images.
Signed-off-by: sp98 <sapillai@redhat.com>
Until now, an object store would create all the necessary
metadata pools and the data pool that were exclusively
for its own object store. When isolation between object
stores is necessary, this would cause many pools and
PGs to be created in the cluster, which was not
manageable.
Now one set of pools can be created to be shared
by any number of object stores. The metadata and data
between each object store is isolated by
RADOS namespaces, which by design will keep the
data safe for multi-tenancy.
Signed-off-by: Travis Nielsen <tnielsen@redhat.com>
add an option to set prefix for the name of obc provisioner instead of
ceph cluster namespace.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Rook has been setting the application automatically on all
pools to rbd for CephBlockPools, rook-ceph-rgw for
CephObjectStores, mgr on the built-in .mgr pool,
and nfs on the built-in .nfs pool.
The legacy pool device_health_metrics is long gone
from Pacific which is no longer supported, so we can
remove special handling for that pool in the upgrade
guide and in the code.
The application setting is now available on the pool spec
although it is not expected to commonly need to override
the default applications set by Rook.
The application for CephFilesystem pools is now being
set to cephfs, where it was previously blank.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
The name for cephcosi driver should be ceph-cosi-driver and namespace
should same as the rook operator. Otherwise request need to be failed.
Fixes: #13025
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
there was a bug in the code which doesn't
sets realm if we try to get the zonegoup
so because of that 1.12 this backport pr
for original change was not working
Signed-off-by: parth-gr <partharora1010@gmail.com>
Loop variables cannot be reliably uses since they will
change with each iteration. Update these loop variable
uses to be safe by indexing the slice rather than
using the loop variable directly.
Also suppress the linter issues for passwords used
in tests.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
This commits removes controller-runtime dependencies
from the apis dir and to achieve that we are removing
webhook.
Signed-off-by: subhamkrai <srai@redhat.com>
During certain maintenance tasks the admin will own running
operations on the ceph mgr, rgw, mds and rbd-mirror daemons
and the operator should not interfere with those operations.
Co-authored-by: gauravsitlani <gaurav.sitlani@live.com>
Signed-off-by: subhamkrai <srai@redhat.com>
In Reef the is_master changed from a string to a bool
so we must update the type for proper json
serialization.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
There are 2 cases of randomly generated secrets copied into Rook's unit
test code that have been flagged by Gitleaks. Add a comment to both
cases to help the tool understand that these aren't real production
secrets -- just unit test stand-ins.
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
For an OBC's name we cannot simply use the OBC's namespace and name,
because they can be reused, while the preceding bucket might be
retained by reclaimPolicy. (Commit 2733375ca4 also didn't solve
this issue, as it is an intra-cluster issue.) Therefore we instead
use the OBC's UID which should be unique within the cluster and
across clusters.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hasler <sebastian.hasler@stuvus.uni-stuttgart.de>
Change how Rook detects network CIDRs for Multus networks. The IPAM
configuration is only defined as an arbitrary string JSON blob with a
"type" field and nothing more. Rook's detection of CIDRs for whereabouts
had already grown out of date since the initial implementation.
Additionally, Rook did not support DHCP IPAM, which is a reasonable
choice for users. And more, Rook did not support CNI plugin chaining,
which further complicates NADs. Based on the CNI spec, network chaning
can result in any changes to network CIDRs from the first-given plugin.
All these problems make it more and more difficult for Rook to support
Multus by inspecting the NAD itself to predict network CIDRs. Instead,
it is better for Rook to treat the CNI process as a black box. To
preserve legacy functionality of auto-detecting networks and to make
that as robust as possible, change to a canary-style architecture like
that used for Ceph mons, from which Rook will detect the network CIDRs
if possible.
Also allow users to specify overrides for CIDR ranges. This allows Rook
to still support esoteric and unexpected NAD or network configurations
where a CIDR range is not detectable or where the range detected would
be incomplete. Because it may be impossible for Rook to understand the
network CIDRs wholistically while residing only on a portion of the
network, this feature should have been present from Multus's inception.
Improving CIDR auto-detection and allowing users to specify overrides
for auto-detected CIDRs rounds out Rook's Multus support for CephCluster
(core/RADOS) installations. No further architectural changes should be
needed for CephClusters as regards application of public/cluster network
CIDRs for Multus networks.
Signed-off-by: Blaine Gardner <blaine.gardner@ibm.com>
We need to restart all the ceph daemons whenever
cephCluster network settings are modified like
requiremsgr2, encryption and compression. This
required for Ceph to consider the new settings
it require new ceph daemons all over.
Signed-off-by: subhamkrai <srai@redhat.com>
If bucket exists for Provision(), then check whether user in the OBC and
owner of bucket are same.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
The object user was previously required to be created in the
same namespace as the object store and the cluster. Now,
the object user can be reconciled even in a different namespace
from the cluster and object store. The namespace would be specified
in the object user CR.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Some logging instructions use formatting syntax `%q`, but the logging method is
`Info` or `Debug` instead of `Debugf` and `Infof`. As a result, the arguments of
the method were concatenated instead of formatted properly.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Henry <polyedre@disroot.org>
Update the ceph cosi driver image to v0.1.1, so that it can
work on both amd and arm platforms.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Gateways that do not run the sync threads should not be accessible from one of
the Zone endpoint. If this is the case, the synchronization might stop working.
When the CephObjectStore has the option
`spec.gateway.disableMultisiteSyncTraffic` set to `true`, we must ensure that
the objectstore endpoint is not present in the Zone endpoint.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Henry <polyedre@disroot.org>
The controller was attempting to delete the cosi driver
again and again, always failing the reconcile when the
driver did not exist. Since the desired state is for the
driver not to exist when disabled, return a successful
reconcile.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
Adding CephCOSIDriver CRD and controller. The controller will bring up
the ceph cosi driver when first object store is created in the rook
operator namespace. Then admin can defined COSI CRDs like BucketClass
and BucketAccessClass for different object stores deployed via Rook.
Using the BucketClass and BucketAccessClass, user can define
BucketAccess for backend bucket in the RGW. The CephCOSIDriver CRD
defines configuration options for ceph cosi driver. In the first version
its usability is minimal. Even if it is not defined Rook will bring up
the ceph cosi driver with default values.
Signed-off-by: Jiffin Tony Thottan <thottanjiffin@gmail.com>
Some users want to deploy two CephObjectStores for a single Zone. The first
configures RGWs to process the synchronization of the data, while the second
CephObjectStore configures the client RGWs.
Currently, this can be implemented by setting the RGW option
'rgw_run_sync_thread' in the 'rook-config-override' ConfigMap, though it is not
really user friendly.
Ref: https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/radosgw/config-ref/#confval-rgw_run_sync_thread
This commit adds a new option in the CephObjectStore CRD as defined in issue
https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/12272. The new option
'disableMultisiteSyncTraffic' determine whether the operator should disable the
multisite sync threads for the RGWs.
If the option is set to 'false', or if the option is not specified, the operator
does nothing. This ensures that the multisite sync threads will not be enabled
for users that disabled explicitely the multisite sync threads either manually
or with the 'rook-config-override' ConfigMap.
This commit also recommends to use two objectstore when scaling Ceph Objectstore
Multisite replication, with one objectstore configured with disabled replication
traffic.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Henry <polyedre@disroot.org>
users & buckets admin capabilities aren't spelled the same
way between rook crd (singular) and ceph (plural). It's a bit
misleading when comparing ceph admin cap and rook users.
Signed-off-by: Peter Goron <peter.goron@gmail.com>
Blaine Gardner
yingshanghuangqiao
Travis Nielsen
subhamkrai
Jiffin Tony Thottan
Satoru Takeuchi
Santosh Pillai
parth-gr
gauravsitlani
parth-gr
Redouane Kachach
guoguangwu
Sebastian Hasler
Lucas Henry
Peter Goron