When CPU requests and limits are assigned to a pod,
the pod will be guaranteed the requests, up to the limits.
Even if there are spare CPU cycles, the pod cannot use
them. Thus, pods can be unnecessarily denied compute
when they need to burst if the limits are set.
Therefore, it is not recommended to set CPU limits
since the CPU requests are already guaranteeing that
no pod will be starved at least for its requests.
Signed-off-by: travisn <tnielsen@redhat.com>
For now we are using the operator namespace name
as the prefix for the csi driver, This PR provides
an option for the users if someone wants to have
their own prefix for the csi driver, if someone tries
to change the prefix for existing csi driver rook
operator will fail to reconcile the csi driver.
Signed-off-by: Madhu Rajanna <madhupr007@gmail.com>
When creating EC fs, create replicated pool as primary
pool and ec pool as secondary pool, creating ec pool
as primary is not encouraged and it will lead to failure.
Also, changing the pool name in storageclass-ec file.
Closes: https://github.com/rook/rook/issues/8210
Signed-off-by: subhamkrai <srai@redhat.com>