feedc0de/qt-creator
1
0
Fork 0
forked from qt-creator/qt-creator
Code Pull Requests Activity

short-cut evaluation inside if() tests

Browse Source 
this is consistent with the top-level scope evaluation.
This commit is contained in:
Oswald Buddenhagen
2010-04-08 15:36:17 +02:00
parent 40ffa44b74
commit 295e07eadc
1 changed files with 8 additions and 12 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

20
src/shared/proparser/profileevaluator.cpp
View File

@@ -2503,6 +2503,8 @@ ProItem::ProItemReturn ProFileEvaluator::Private::evaluateConditionalFunction(
logMessage(format("unexpected next()."));
return ProItem::ReturnFalse;
case T_IF: {
if (m_skipLevel && !m_cumulative)
return ProItem::ReturnFalse;
if (args.count() != 1) {
logMessage(format("if(condition) requires one argument."));
return ProItem::ReturnFalse;
@@ -2560,19 +2562,13 @@ ProItem::ProItemReturn ProFileEvaluator::Private::evaluateConditionalFunction(
args += c;
}
if (!parens && (isOp || d == ed)) {
// Yes, qmake doesn't shortcut evaluations here. We can't, either,
// as some test functions have side effects.
bool success;
if (isFunc) {
success = evaluateConditionalFunction(test, args);
} else {
success = isActiveConfig(test, true);
if (m_cumulative || (orOp != ret)) {
if (isFunc)
ret = evaluateConditionalFunction(test, args);
else
ret = isActiveConfig(test, true);
ret ^= invert;
}
success ^= invert;
if (orOp)
ret |= success;
else
ret &= success;
orOp = (c == '|');
invert = false;
isFunc = false;