Compile fix with recent Qt dev

The reasoning in 1b4766e26c did not take into account that the scope
of QT_NO_JAVA_STYLE_ITERATORS may change over time, as done with
f70905448f6 in Qt base.

Change-Id: Ib1966ff26c4d36d5f62e149d6b45baa4aecf825d
Reviewed-by: Eike Ziller <eike.ziller@qt.io>
This commit is contained in:
hjk
2019-07-24 13:43:54 +02:00
parent 02e224fcfa
commit e3b1106afa
70 changed files with 238 additions and 491 deletions

View File

@@ -53,11 +53,9 @@ static bool overlaps(int posA, int lengthA, int posB, int lengthB) {
}
}
bool ChangeSet::hasOverlap(int pos, int length)
bool ChangeSet::hasOverlap(int pos, int length) const
{
QListIterator<EditOp> i(m_operationList);
while (i.hasNext()) {
const EditOp &cmd = i.next();
for (const EditOp &cmd : m_operationList) {
switch (cmd.type) {
case EditOp::Replace:
@@ -251,9 +249,7 @@ void ChangeSet::doReplace(const EditOp &op, QList<EditOp> *replaceList)
Q_ASSERT(op.type == EditOp::Replace);
{
QMutableListIterator<EditOp> i(*replaceList);
while (i.hasNext()) {
EditOp &c = i.next();
for (EditOp &c : *replaceList) {
if (op.pos1 <= c.pos1)
c.pos1 += op.text.size();
if (op.pos1 < c.pos1)