Recently tons of warnings show up for presumably "problematic"
singned <-> unsigned and size conversions.
The Qt side uses 'int', and that's the biggest 'integration surface'
for us, so instead of establishing some internal boundary between
signed and unsigned areas, push that boundary out of creator core code,
and use 'int' everywhere.
Because it reduces friction further, also do it in libcplusplus.
Change-Id: I84f3b79852c8029713e7ea6f133ffb9ef7030a70
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@qt.io>
For some reason, Q_UNUSED includes already a semicolon, adding one
on the user side creates an additional empty statement.
Change-Id: I9c5e8fac381345a60792cb75e2938fd53958d3b0
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
...and not byte offsets anymore. This is necessary in order to calculate
the line and column numbers correctly with respect to unicode code
points.
Change-Id: I5d79857b3eaefeb8d563b4f1e3938a64debc5e08
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
This will save us toLatin1() conversations in CppTools (which already
holds UTF-8 encoded QByteArrays) and thus loss of information (see
QTCREATORBUG-7356). It also gives us support for non-latin1 identifiers.
API-wise the following functions are added to Token. In follow-up
patches these will become handy in combination with QStrings.
utf16chars() - aequivalent of bytes()
utf16charsBegin() - aequivalent of bytesBegin()
utf16charsEnd() - aequivalent of bytesEnd()
Next steps:
* Adapt functions from TranslationUnit. They should work with utf16
chars in order to calculate lines and columns correctly also for
UTF-8 multi-byte code points.
* Adapt the higher level clients:
* Cpp{Tools,Editor} should expect UTF-8 encoded Literals.
* Cpp{Tools,Editor}: When dealing with identifiers on the
QString/QTextDocument layer, code points
represendet by two QChars need to be respected, too.
* Ensure Macro::offsets() and Document::MacroUse::{begin,end}() report
offsets usable in CppEditor/CppTools.
Addresses QTCREATORBUG-7356.
Change-Id: I0791b5236be8215d24fb8e38a1f7cb0d279454c0
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
