We used to style overloaded operators in the same way
as C++'s built-in operators. There was no way to tell
if a + token would call a operator+() function or not.
Now, if an operator is overloaded (redefined),
we give it the "Overloaded Operator"-mixin so users
can style it differently.
Note: Calls to overloaded 'new' and 'delete' are not
highlighted by "Overloaded Operator". This is because
clang today always maps these to CXCursor_CXXNewExpr
and CXCursor_CXXDeleteExpr with cursor.spelling == ""
(empty string). So there is no (?) quick way for us
to tell if a new/delete-token was overloaded or not.
After follow-ups, follow symbol will work for operator
overload usages in current translation unit.
Commit is appended by Ivan Donchevskii.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-19659
Change-Id: I157855d482a61ad2059642a1ee982089fcb7d312
Reviewed-by: Ivan Donchevskii <ivan.donchevskii@qt.io>
Now it's in accordance with clangrefactoringbackend/source and
clangpchmanagerbackend/source.
Change-Id: I939cfc72cffb8fcde0649f125e6efb6670d1cbc3
Reviewed-by: Tim Jenssen <tim.jenssen@qt.io>
