...which was least buggy.
The bugs fixed by the changes we revert here (highlighting/completion
for code involving templates) were minor compared to ones we currently
have. Those bugs will be addressed by the clang code model anyway.
Relevant commits were collected via:
$ cd ${QTC}/src/libs/cplusplus
$ git log \
--no-merges \
--format=oneline \
v3.4.2..HEAD \
-- LookupContext.* ResolveExpression.* TypeResolver.* TypeOfExpression.* \
../../plugins/cpptools/cppcompletion_test.cpp
From this list the following were skipped due to irrelevance:
88c5b47e53 # CppTools: Minor cleanup in completion tests
e5255a1f5c # CppTools: Add a test for ObjC not replacing dot with arrow
5b12c8d63a # CppTools: Support ObjC in member access operator tests
9fef4fb9ca # CPlusPlus: Fix warnings about overriding visit(...) methods
There were only minor conflicts while reverting those.
This changes touches so many files because there were quite some
cleanups and renames after the 3.4.2 release.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-14889
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-15211
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-15213
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-15257
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-15264
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-15291
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-15329
Change-Id: I01f759f8f35ecb4228928a4f22086e279c1a5435
Reviewed-by: Marco Bubke <marco.bubke@theqtcompany.com>
The code model failed to parse the noexcept operator which is often
used in noexcept specifiers, e.g.: "void f() noexcept(noexcept(g()));"
Consequently some c++11 headers such as unordered_map, array
and unordered_set could not be parsed and no code completition was
available. I have created the NoExceptOperatorExpressionAST class
which is created whenever a noexcept token is found in an
expression with operator precedence. The noExcept test case
in the cplusplus/cxx11 test now contains a function that
uses the noexcept operator.
Fixed noexcept operator parsing
Added the test requested by Sergey Shambir, which then revealed that
i had not implemeneted the noexpect operator parsing according to the
c++ specification.
As stated here http://cpp0x.centaur.ath.cx/expr.unary.noexcept.html
the noexcept operator is a unary-expression that contains an
expression (and not a constant-expression). This should now be fixed.
Change-Id: Id4a99a43b660bd83e7680274491d99a698b57094
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@theqtcompany.com>
...especially in CppTools/CppEditor where the offsets are used with a
QString/QTextDocument.
Change-Id: Ic6d18fbc01fb9cc899a9bd2d7424cd2edae487f1
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
This will avoid confusion when later more length and indices methods are
added.
In Token:
length() --> bytes()
begin() --> bytesBegin()
end() --> bytesEnd()
Change-Id: I244c69b022e239ee762b4114559e707f93ff344f
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
They are already inlined. Now it's easier to find read-only accesses.
Change-Id: I9aaeca3bc5860e3a20a536a2484925e4334c005f
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
When the cursor is on the name of declaration of a templated function,
then since f93758b8e1 the scope returned
by Document::findScopeAt is the scope of the template declaration.
Before it was the parent scope of the template declaration.
The check in FindUsages::checkCandidates did not check all combinations
of template(-child symbol) scopes for the searched symbol and its
occurrences.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-9749
Change-Id: Idc84a2ba718721ce54683a67635a93352784ddd1
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@digia.com>
Fix find usages for template class(class name and template parameters)
or template function(template parameters).
Fixed:
* marking
* find usages
* follow symbol
Change-Id: I22fdbc11260cbd8ee9aafdd76aaeee0f4f49f9fd
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
If type is not found we try to find 'using' declaration for this type.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-7903
Change-Id: I569db9e1a8504a5da3115ebbed2e823d5924f6ca
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
... and adjust INCLUDEPATH accordingly.
while i'm at messing with include statements, also re-order the include
blocks according to policy and sort them within bigger blocks.
Change-Id: I7762abfd7c4ecf59432b99db2f424e4fa25733a5
Reviewed-by: Tobias Hunger <tobias.hunger@digia.com>
Reviewed-by: Eike Ziller <eike.ziller@digia.com>
This time in the 'new' expression. Changed it to make
new C(1, abc...) and new C{1, abc}
work.
Change-Id: I7232798fd083b653ee04ef9ede386d6536133e16
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Also drop the unused 'initializer' member from
RangeBasedForStatementAST.
Change-Id: I078ebbc85cafa643af4bfe62d698bf7de71360e4
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
It'll be reused as the initializer expression for declarators
that are followed by "( expression-list )".
Change-Id: I6c76a76641941874ef1ed21daa7b6e057c6d170f
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
There was a fix for QTCREATORBUG-7730 in the case of nested
forward declarations in commit 74a458bca0.
However, it introduced regressions and actually didn't solve
the issue, since the behavior was hidden by another error fixed later.
The patch should properly fix the issue and the regression pointed
in QTCREATORBUG-7777.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-7730
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-7777
Change-Id: I27397fefdc7cc9a60111761df1f76a01407886f7
Reviewed-by: Christian Kamm <christian.d.kamm@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Continuinng a previous commit... This is in order to make
the interface clearer.
Change-Id: Ic1b05217f878578bc84a064927507b75981c47d6
Reviewed-by: Roberto Raggi <roberto.raggi@nokia.com>
The model uses UTF-8 internally and it makes more sense to only
convert when necessary.
A following commit will rename the source/setSource methods in
document for more clarity too.
Change-Id: I960ea0754efabd1436ad4b4299a57faeb65a8bee
Reviewed-by: Roberto Raggi <roberto.raggi@nokia.com>