Makes spotting variables in the process environment easier.
Change-Id: I5841cf299840082ff62d96bcb57386a0352ee08d
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
int main()
{
int foo = 42;
void *bar = &foo; // bar has no object address
return 0;
}
Change-Id: I917c2976bd618c096bfd704abff8b3538e38a0d3
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
This requires making template argument extraction a bit more robust
GCC 5.4.1 created debug info only reports the first argument for
boost::variant<int, bool>:
#include <boost/variant/variant.hpp
int main() { boost::variant<int, float> v = 1; return 0; }
py print(gdb.parse_and_eval('v').type)
-> boost::variant<int, float>
py print(gdb.parse_and_eval('v').type.template_argument(0))
-> int
py print(gdb.parse_and_eval('v').type.template_argument(1))
-> Traceback (most recent call last):
File \"<string>\", line 1, in <module>
RuntimeError: No argument 1 in template.
Error while executing Python code.
Change-Id: Iedca8b073078c93449ab61bb2cab05d6cd9803ba
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
It's used twice, always for 'this', and whenever asked for by the
user's 'Dereference Pointers Automatically' choice, but needs to
be done at different times.
Change-Id: I4dc7340d0a4cb3eb0c7ff17d59e39be0e3870aa0
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
These could be triggered by declared but undefined and unused
static data members.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-18030
Change-Id: I941e8cbe8ce18dca737e59472ed0ee19ace44072
Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@qt.io>
Gcc does not write out full type names with 'using template ...', see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80466
This is in most cases harmless for Creator as dumpers are triggered
independently of template arguments. However, if the dumper takes
different code path based on the template argument type, as is
e.g. needed for std::vector<bool>, wrong results are produced,
as the type cache only used the template base name as type id.
Work around by mangling the id of the un-typedef-ed type into
the type id of a typedef, which, in case of templates contain
the full parameter list.
Change-Id: I63c59cccdc186b09ff780e9dfd57b0ad668ae98f
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Throwing an exception in these cases is not uncommon and should
be handled properly.
Change-Id: I8d4377bf26a4e31971da724904dd5ea5f01a95e1
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Also adding a test covering this dumper.
Change-Id: I491dd87e52f65bf3faf21d81436f264507bf0b51
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
This fixes throwing an uncaught exception if local variables contain
arrays or pointer to a type that can not be looked up.
Change-Id: If9407e5cf5d86bb89594266d4122a53dd65a80bb
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Cdb also seems to return <gentype number> type names for
virtual function table types.
Change-Id: I0d9accb88222de599488fabdb69c7f1585216c8e
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
We get proper notification when QtCore is loaded now, and we either
got it, or not.
Change-Id: I9485126d9b15b8d859ba440f3ba1623f03527ef8
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Makes it clear that this is meant to be immutable and is supposedly
faster.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-17823
Change-Id: Ie5d67b793e0bc4f704981d5161efc12bcc22100a
Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Return the typeId instead of triggering a type lookup when accessing the
type name and no TypeData is available.
Change-Id: I4d46d5356d38184d73427e5a65c3986d30520cf9
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
...if native debugger value for an integral typed value can not be
interpreted as an integer.
Change-Id: Ic9753dd56f5d1854dc0765d5de2a0258a38615d8
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
