As the name function name suggests, true should be returned if the
declaration should be processed. Otherwise false.
Change-Id: I8d266d99c579b331fee8772bde47aa1a466dae9c
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
CPlusPlus::Parser::parseAccessSpecifier() is not used anywhere
throughout the QtCreator codebase.
Change-Id: I062a4ae257b9c61f02bf85079feb6d48bd07c49e
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
This is an obvious typo considering the checks at the beginning of the function.
Change-Id: I11b784153b650b02bba7bb942ca1131447a3da4a
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
MEMBER was added in Qt5.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-10068
Change-Id: Ic6c15a0e5ee8981ab98e4c12fc1521dc281b731f
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
No semantic analysis yet, but this prevents the parser from generating
bogus diagnostics.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-9309
Change-Id: I2ec575a8474cd51bfa97b17678d3da71ab8dcd7a
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@digia.com>
C++ standard defines that 'try' should be before optional ctor
initializer, so wrong order changed. Added documentation to
parseTryBlockStatement and new test.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-9064
Change-Id: Id19cdc53c034cb1232ae27e0bfe36d85b7ad0452
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
When a constructor is defined with a single, unnamed argument of a custom type without
extra type specifiers (const...), then the constructor was not identified as such.
There was an heuristic in case the constructor was in the class definition, but not if the
the constructor was defined later.
Examples:
class Arg;
class Other;
class Foo {
Foo(Arg /*arg*/); // working
Foo(const Arg /*arg*/); // working
Foo(int /*arg*/); // working
Foo(Other /*arg*/) {} // working
};
Foo::Foo(Arg /*arg*/) {} // used not to work, fixed
Foo::Foo(Arg arg){} // working
Foo::Foo(const Arg /*arg*/) {} // working
Foo::Foo(int arg) {} // working
Change-Id: I741e4ba62672ddc99a837fdcdc27996fba5ae6c7
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
#!/usr/bin/env ruby
Dir.glob('**/*.cpp') { |file|
# skip ast (excluding paste, astpath, and canv'ast'imer)
next if file =~ /ast[^eip]|keywords\.|qualifiers|preprocessor|names.cpp/i
s = File.read(file)
next if s.include?('qlalr')
orig = s.dup
s.gsub!(/\n *if [^\n]*{\n[^\n]*\n\s+}(\s+else if [^\n]* {\n[^\n]*\n\s+})*(\s+else {\n[^\n]*\n\s+})?\n/m) { |m|
res = $&
if res =~ /^\s*(\/\/|[A-Z_]{3,})/ # C++ comment or macro (Q_UNUSED, SDEBUG), do not touch braces
res
else
res.gsub!('} else', 'else')
res.gsub!(/\n +} *\n/m, "\n")
res.gsub(/ *{$/, '')
end
}
s.gsub!(/ *$/, '')
File.open(file, 'wb').write(s) if s != orig
}
Change-Id: I3b30ee60df0986f66c02132c65fc38a3fbb6bbdc
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Empty lists would have a single null entry, instead of being null
entirely.
Change-Id: I5114cf1e0ecdbcde5631511ad03a8d559668ea80
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
This time in the 'new' expression. Changed it to make
new C(1, abc...) and new C{1, abc}
work.
Change-Id: I7232798fd083b653ee04ef9ede386d6536133e16
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
This will fix a couple more places where brace-init-lists and
pack expansions are allowed but are not currently accepted by
the parser. For example:
foo(abc...);
now parses correctly.
Change-Id: I93710cef35154fea8437329f3174e4a2d56637b8
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Also drop the unused 'initializer' member from
RangeBasedForStatementAST.
Change-Id: I078ebbc85cafa643af4bfe62d698bf7de71360e4
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Means
void foo() const &; void bar() &&;
and the corresponding pointer-to-member declarators
now parse.
Change-Id: Idbf295bd4f51cd5d9e38efcac1940b8cc2e32fce
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
This allows them to be used in declarator initializers that expect
an expression list in parentheses. Like
T v({1, 2}, 3, 4);
Change-Id: I62e1ffd355ca88f7acbb8708c9b40c8310489ca3
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
It'll be reused as the initializer expression for declarators
that are followed by "( expression-list )".
Change-Id: I6c76a76641941874ef1ed21daa7b6e057c6d170f
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Although they are now supported by the lexer
and parser, it is worth to remind that we still
need to address an issue concerning the highlight
of multiline literals (which with the advent of
the new raw strings will become more common).
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-6722
Change-Id: I137337a9ac0152a1f8b9faded0b960c6fe3dd38a
Reviewed-by: Roberto Raggi <roberto.raggi@nokia.com>
