Although they are now supported by the lexer
and parser, it is worth to remind that we still
need to address an issue concerning the highlight
of multiline literals (which with the advent of
the new raw strings will become more common).
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-6722
Change-Id: I137337a9ac0152a1f8b9faded0b960c6fe3dd38a
Reviewed-by: Roberto Raggi <roberto.raggi@nokia.com>
The parser now understands emit/Q_EMIT as an expression statement.
Also, the recent fixes in the preprocessor introduced a side-effect
in the hanlding of code such as: emit signal(); Member signal started
being treated as a local use (parsed as a declaration) and possibily
being highlighted as unused variable.
Previously that worked by accident since there was an inconsistency
in the preprocessor on which only object-like macros were being
expanded even when the "no expand" flag was set. Then, the code
mentioned above was being parsed as an expression, what kind of worked.
Change-Id: I47a68ed4c1c1702872620b8ed7c7264fb0997034
Reviewed-by: Roberto Raggi <roberto.raggi@nokia.com>
Those are the types char16_t and char32_t along with the new
char/string literals u'', U'', u"", u8"", and U"".
This is particularly important for the use of QStringLiteral
since in some platforms it relies on expansion such as above.
Note: The string literals quickfixes still need some tunning.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-7449
Change-Id: Iebcfea15677dc8e0ebb6143def89a5477e1be7d4
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Actually, those should have gone in the previous corresponding
commits which introduced support for the keywords.
Change-Id: Ie95944899c426a2c2b03e60d1ad557e00bc3a82a
Reviewed-by: Roberto Raggi <roberto.raggi@nokia.com>
Cause: Q_PRIVATE_PROPERTY didn't have an entry in token_names, so if
Token::spell or Token::name was called on a T_Q_GADGET, an out-of-bounds
access would occur.
Change-Id: I1ec7b91a5d3def5508e21ad4f1863a52cb4ed540
Reviewed-on: http://codereview.qt.nokia.com/4207
Reviewed-by: Christian Kamm <christian.d.kamm@nokia.com>
they are lying. nokia has no copyright on this code. and the double
license in a single file looks weird. that's why we moved it to
3rdparty/, so it is clear it is not nokia's.
Approved-by: legal
