This applies for e.g.
* "Add Definition..." (on function decl)
* "Move Definition..." (on function decl)
* "Insert Virtual Functions of Base Class" (on class specifier)
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-11849
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-19699
Change-Id: I0d259bc1782470f3b3f19617230005a5594a5cca
Reviewed-by: Cristian Adam <cristian.adam@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Orgad Shaneh <orgads@gmail.com>
Recently tons of warnings show up for presumably "problematic"
singned <-> unsigned and size conversions.
The Qt side uses 'int', and that's the biggest 'integration surface'
for us, so instead of establishing some internal boundary between
signed and unsigned areas, push that boundary out of creator core code,
and use 'int' everywhere.
Because it reduces friction further, also do it in libcplusplus.
Change-Id: I84f3b79852c8029713e7ea6f133ffb9ef7030a70
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@qt.io>
E.g.:
enum E { x = 1 + 2 + 1 };
constantValue for enumeratorDeclaration currently is equal: '1+2+1'
(spaces between are removed).
Fixed version produces "1 + 2 + 1".
Change-Id: I38f7703bd5c856c28aadeecd7f7923aa4a7da422
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@digia.com>
For the case:
const int x = 12;
enum E { e = x };
constantValue for EnumeratorDeclaration has value=' x'. It should have 'x'.
Change-Id: Iaca77cccd1e0dc5274696b0c96cec6ac2f904979
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
For a given AST, CppRefactoringFile and Overview this will create a
ChangeSet for rewriting the pointer or reference declaration according
to the Overview.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-6169
Change-Id: If6f824c1ea5e9f53a11a58ec8b6d696d01f0723e
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
This time in the 'new' expression. Changed it to make
new C(1, abc...) and new C{1, abc}
work.
Change-Id: I7232798fd083b653ee04ef9ede386d6536133e16
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
It'll be reused as the initializer expression for declarators
that are followed by "( expression-list )".
Change-Id: I6c76a76641941874ef1ed21daa7b6e057c6d170f
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
they are lying. nokia has no copyright on this code. and the double
license in a single file looks weird. that's why we moved it to
3rdparty/, so it is clear it is not nokia's.
Approved-by: legal
