Parts of the Debugger engine rampdown mechanisms are
essentially one code path now, don't distribute that
over four classes.
Change-Id: I4c6edbc0db94d1f658b0c1d9c154552f286db876
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Allow to rely on kit plus data directly specified in the dialogs.
This means, RunControls with nullptr RunConfigurations are allowed
again.
Change-Id: I0b574b397603c0520c8187a8967bff2cf5e20ae8
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
There was almost 1:1 overlap with DebuggerRunTool::is{Cpp,Qml}Debugging,
use one version only.
Change-Id: I4a8f2b7005d3f2e440cdab3eaf6ac476af894308
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
The idea is that the fixup should not be needed at all anymore,
instead, static data coming e.g. from the RunConfiguration should
be setup in the constructor, and everything else should be ready
at entry into start().
This also proceeds on path to the planned-but-never-implemented
idea that the RunConfiguration should (at most) be accessed at
RunControl creation time, not later.
Change-Id: I04d622785f5de628a7bb479bc0c39aff7d6cce01
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
It's all coming via individual setters now.
Change-Id: I373f43963e696fa7223f9d664de1df1bc8b021e5
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
The users (typically target specific DebuggerRunTool derived classes)
are meant to use the individual setter functions nowadays, not the set
up the full structure, so the members are a true implementation
detail now.
Change-Id: Ida04801e3230a2fe8bbadde8845e58c3077c87a5
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
... a step towards abandoning the engine-related bits of
the debugger state machinery. The base RunWorker states
meant for that are good enough now.
Change-Id: I3b269bdeb66f14a956b76e6a7e8258f45b3e59e5
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
... into DebuggerRunTool creation and explicit RunParameter bulk setting,
which later is to be replaced by setting individual parameters.
Change-Id: Ic4d2c6d10d659287ae61fdb4db735e658e3a68ce
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
The idea is to use them later to make the DebugRunTool setup leaner.
As proof of concept, use the new interface in LinuxDeviceDebugSupport.
Change-Id: I045ba4d05cfc56a9e875fd4461e9f562153872dd
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Let the workers keep track of errors instead of passing around
string pointers in some but not all interesting places.
Change-Id: I3956bc947a50747dd3a0c9302b9f9873d192e9c6
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@qt.io>
A RunControl is re-runnable if all its workers are,
a RunWorker is re-runnable if it's Stopped and unless it
says otherwise.
Also ensure SimpleTargetRunner only reportStop() once
per run and make process error message re-usable.
Change-Id: I73f5fb724d3026ceb81d5e32a3a71b4814b2bca9
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Not in start(), when it would add extra connections on each re-run.
Change-Id: I5fe9e047a188276f3bde54227dc0509ab77366c4
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Makes remote output appear again in the Application Output pane,
and is arguably the right thing to do anyway.
Change-Id: I05c365eec43f60a85482b8ae7d5856b3a31ee6f8
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
It looks like the case where workers need talk to each other by
only knowing the type of the 'partner' does not exist in practice
anymore. With the now-common setup of a 'primary' worker that one
can introduce the 'lesser' workers to each other directly.
That's also conceptually more robust that picking a partner by
type only only from some 'pool' (all the workers in a runcontrol),
scales better (it e.g. is imaginable that a RunControl needs
more than one PortGatherer in complex setups where more than one
device is involved) saves a few cycles, and even removes the need
for workers to be qobject_cast-able.
Change-Id: Ib3d8c942c893d6c198d9813cce7df28ba3260ce8
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
Not needed anymore in the world of RunWorkers.
Change-Id: Id7fb24fece6acb03de12f2677dd99a05c513e7a4
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Vikas Pachdha <vikas.pachdha@qt.io>
Note that this changes the startup timing in the StartupOnNetwork
case slightly, as the application launch is now triggered in
parallel with the gdb launch.
Change-Id: Iaa0b60b8c478eb47abb6e93fbd3b326e0acdd13b
Reviewed-by: Denis Shienkov <denis.shienkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
This moves all of the RunControl implementation into a single
RunWorker, not yet splitting it up into separate RunWorkers
which is the final goal of this series.
Change-Id: I7373105603505aa4fffd7fe5ff0145f0128b34bc
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
There were only two used target states, and in case of mixed
debugging all parts of the machinery better agree on the
direction. So one bool in the (shared) runTool is sufficient.
Change-Id: Iffbf1651b82dde707cfc37d8da9d3da573b34b76
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
The parameters belong to the run control, they should not
be triplicated in case of a combined engine.
Change-Id: I4dd84220edbd7a44b902cc52627fe01d0568db75
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
This increases re-usability of activities like 'port gathering',
and makes their use less dependent on actual device implementations.
Change-Id: I017cb74874f2b38c487ba2d03906a675d5618647
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Forward all tool and target activities to run control, and initiate
further state transitions (only) from there. Also, make sure
tool/target's on finished() triggered on all finishing code paths.
After that, the base state handling is sufficient to handle remote linux
running and debugging.
Change-Id: I0150ef249c9ad0b7b8ac7192be6dc860c9ca8fc5
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Remove some now-unusual connection to RunControl::finished
and use a finished() callback in the ToolRunner implementation
instead.
Change-Id: Ieddf05a2258d9a300ac50a739d77d9cfaee10ca6
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Basically all derived tools will need access to the debugger aspect
data. Fetch it once.
Change-Id: I054e4255a036db258201a8a501af244206c06990
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Add some customization hooks to make tools aware of target errors
and vice versa.
Change-Id: I4d815087297a3fa1d1d6d52daeed7c4ae0f624bf
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Aim is to replace it with its ProjectExplorer::RunControl base.
Change-Id: I30f837050e7c016887dc4b6cfef10b947f4f88ed
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
It's tool specific, so put it into the tool (only) related code.
The additional level of indirection will go again, plus the original
one will be removed once the *DebugSupport classes can directly
use DebuggerRunTool as base.
Change-Id: Ieaa386a0f7d724b09cedaaba8fb7d1e6dc4ad55b
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@qt.io>
That's a temporary move to be able to port the per-target
Debug*Support classes one by one.
Change-Id: I3cf5f9ea367a68058add8713ed23f44da080a175
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
This (temporarily) works around the start up regression due
to wrong order of merged patches.
Change-Id: I7a386fb06175363aa23862716687764b930c52d8
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Less coupling than using virtual functions for better re-use.
Change-Id: Ibbab38175538f65c0f563129c87e01736ed220af
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
