The test data produces different results when it is run with libclang
3.6 and libclang 3.8. (lib)clang 3.8 will generate an error instead of a
warning and suppress further diagnostics. See below.
Use simpler test data that is agnostic to the different clang versions.
$ cat input.cpp
class X {
X(X&&) noexcept;
};
X::X(X&&) = default;
int function()
{
}
$ clang++-3.6 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 input.cpp
input.cpp:5:4: warning: 'X' is missing exception specification 'noexcept'
X::X(X&&) = default;
^
noexcept
input.cpp:2:5: note: previous declaration is here
X(X&&) noexcept;
^
input.cpp:9:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
}
^
2 warnings generated.
$ clang++-3.8 -fsyntax-only -std=c++11 input.cpp
input.cpp:5:4: error: 'X' is missing exception specification 'noexcept'
X::X(X&&) = default;
^
noexcept
input.cpp:2:5: note: previous declaration is here
X(X&&) noexcept;
^
1 error generated.
Change-Id: I6d786a8b87eb4438fa8db36540db9358181b9a5b
Reviewed-by: David Schulz <david.schulz@theqtcompany.com>
Diagnostics are now moved to the clang backend process. Fixits are
supported too.
Change-Id: I20faacf466bbf78dec479220c3d7b336a47bc453
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@theqtcompany.com>
