CPlusPlus::Parser::parseAccessSpecifier() is not used anywhere
throughout the QtCreator codebase.
Change-Id: I062a4ae257b9c61f02bf85079feb6d48bd07c49e
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
No semantic analysis yet, but this prevents the parser from generating
bogus diagnostics.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-9309
Change-Id: I2ec575a8474cd51bfa97b17678d3da71ab8dcd7a
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@digia.com>
C++ standard defines that 'try' should be before optional ctor
initializer, so wrong order changed. Added documentation to
parseTryBlockStatement and new test.
Task-number: QTCREATORBUG-9064
Change-Id: Id19cdc53c034cb1232ae27e0bfe36d85b7ad0452
Reviewed-by: Erik Verbruggen <erik.verbruggen@digia.com>
This time in the 'new' expression. Changed it to make
new C(1, abc...) and new C{1, abc}
work.
Change-Id: I7232798fd083b653ee04ef9ede386d6536133e16
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
This will fix a couple more places where brace-init-lists and
pack expansions are allowed but are not currently accepted by
the parser. For example:
foo(abc...);
now parses correctly.
Change-Id: I93710cef35154fea8437329f3174e4a2d56637b8
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Means
void foo() const &; void bar() &&;
and the corresponding pointer-to-member declarators
now parse.
Change-Id: Idbf295bd4f51cd5d9e38efcac1940b8cc2e32fce
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
It'll be reused as the initializer expression for declarators
that are followed by "( expression-list )".
Change-Id: I6c76a76641941874ef1ed21daa7b6e057c6d170f
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Thanks to Clang's parser_overflow.cpp which has >16000 nested compound
statements to check exactly the same.
Change-Id: I2b604f8ceb01115d7fe950994e0677a081e99481
Reviewed-by: Christian Kamm <christian.d.kamm@nokia.com>
they are lying. nokia has no copyright on this code. and the double
license in a single file looks weird. that's why we moved it to
3rdparty/, so it is clear it is not nokia's.
Approved-by: legal
