Amends c8f29b9e01.
It turns out that there are contexts where we want to parse an
expression statement even with the semicolon missing (e.g. completion on
incomplete code).
So leave the existing functions unchanged and do the thorough check
afterwards in parseIfStatement().
Change-Id: Id6209ef1abfe9d155c5b9381e6ae655cc721feb2
Reviewed-by: Qt CI Bot <qt_ci_bot@qt-project.org>
Reviewed-by: Christian Stenger <christian.stenger@qt.io>
While we do recommend clangd for modern code bases, we should still be
able to parse basic language constructs.
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-27975
Change-Id: I189b991685a5cd5f62f2afce77878b60c895e8f9
Reviewed-by: <github-actions-qt-creator@cristianadam.eu>
Reviewed-by: hjk <hjk@qt.io>
These changes target Find Usages feature to work with shared_ptr.
Improve libs/3rdparty/cplusplus and plugins/cplusplus:
parse __declspec() attribute,
call to variadic function template without specified template arguments,
if constexpr,
c++11 attributes [[value]],
function templates with default parameters,
resolve order for function vs template with default parameter,
template operator->() with default arguments,
template specialization with numeric values,
find best partial specialization,
fix partial specialization for non-first specialized argument
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-7866
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-20781
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-22857
Fixes: QTCREATORBUG-17825
Change-Id: I31a080f7729edfb2ee9650f1aff48daeba5a673b
Reviewed-by: Christian Kandeler <christian.kandeler@qt.io>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <pinaceae.pinus@gmail.com>
The code model failed to parse the noexcept operator which is often
used in noexcept specifiers, e.g.: "void f() noexcept(noexcept(g()));"
Consequently some c++11 headers such as unordered_map, array
and unordered_set could not be parsed and no code completition was
available. I have created the NoExceptOperatorExpressionAST class
which is created whenever a noexcept token is found in an
expression with operator precedence. The noExcept test case
in the cplusplus/cxx11 test now contains a function that
uses the noexcept operator.
Fixed noexcept operator parsing
Added the test requested by Sergey Shambir, which then revealed that
i had not implemeneted the noexpect operator parsing according to the
c++ specification.
As stated here http://cpp0x.centaur.ath.cx/expr.unary.noexcept.html
the noexcept operator is a unary-expression that contains an
expression (and not a constant-expression). This should now be fixed.
Change-Id: Id4a99a43b660bd83e7680274491d99a698b57094
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Kosjar <nikolai.kosjar@theqtcompany.com>
This time in the 'new' expression. Changed it to make
new C(1, abc...) and new C{1, abc}
work.
Change-Id: I7232798fd083b653ee04ef9ede386d6536133e16
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
Also drop the unused 'initializer' member from
RangeBasedForStatementAST.
Change-Id: I078ebbc85cafa643af4bfe62d698bf7de71360e4
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
It'll be reused as the initializer expression for declarators
that are followed by "( expression-list )".
Change-Id: I6c76a76641941874ef1ed21daa7b6e057c6d170f
Reviewed-by: hjk <qthjk@ovi.com>
they are lying. nokia has no copyright on this code. and the double
license in a single file looks weird. that's why we moved it to
3rdparty/, so it is clear it is not nokia's.
Approved-by: legal
