From 088fb3ca9fa8a768f4692bc83bb8be81210f2c53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mateusz Pusz <mateusz.pusz@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2025 07:35:59 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] docs: correct type reference for delta quantities in absolute
 quantities post

---
 docs/blog/posts/introducing-absolute-quantities.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/docs/blog/posts/introducing-absolute-quantities.md b/docs/blog/posts/introducing-absolute-quantities.md
index 53009196..26d3d39f 100644
--- a/docs/blog/posts/introducing-absolute-quantities.md
+++ b/docs/blog/posts/introducing-absolute-quantities.md
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ The above raises a few questions:
 
 1. Does it mean that `quantity<si::seconds>` or `quantity<isq::time[s]>` should not compile?
 2. Should we require the user to always state `quantity<delta<si::seconds>>` or
-   `quantity<delta<si::seconds>>`? This would be consistent with physical equations but more
+   `quantity<delta<isq::time[s]>>`? This would be consistent with physical equations but more
    verbose in the source code.
 3. Should the syntax `40 * s` be disallowed or should it implicitly create`quantity<delta<si::seconds>>`
    instead of `quantity<si::seconds>`?